Leaderboard

Laughing? I can hardly sleep anymore after reading some of the latest threads and learning all the information that's available about bigfoot. I think some sort of critical mass was reached at around the 5 million population mark here in the US. It's obvious they're evolving rapidly because Spanish is spoken mainly in the southeast while most of the rest speak dead languages from the middle east just like our indigenous Native Solutreans. For those who don't know about the petroleum industry and the back to the dark ages initiative this is only the start. I can't go into any more details here but you have no idea how dark and powerful a force the united bigfoot will become. I'm working on a comprehensive plan using an app from weatherunderground and a be your own lawyer flowchart but I'm having trouble correlating the data due to discrepancies between the 4 main types of bigfoot. I suggest you gather your loved ones, supplies for a year and as many cameras as possible before heading for the nearest rural/suburban habituation site. My preliminary data suggests these will be the safest possible sites when dealing with standard type 1 and 3 bigfoot with a rock-solid standard deviance verdict of +- 7 degrees cumulus. Until I can straighten the rest of the data out with information from the Standing/Meldrum/Stroud collaboration regarding bigfoot types 2 and 4 all I can advise is avoiding urban areas at all costs - these will be the first to be overrun. Good luck and good hunting!

I wish to report that on March 22, 2014 at 13:34 a member of my group and myself experienced an infrasound event with a recorder running. The experience manifested physiologically as a buzzing deep vibration in the abdomen, fear, anxiety, and a strong need to leave the area even though being in the field looking for BF. That seems illogical following the event so perhaps another symptom is confusion. While we recognized the event immediately for what it was, it was not pleasant and probably not intended to be. Initial investigation of the recorder did reveal any significant audio as the frequency of what was experienced was well below the frequency response of the Zoom H2 recorder. But closer examination of the recording with graphics audio analysis software revealed a graphics trace consistent with the experienced frequencies at the appropriate time line. Preliminary findings: Infrasound is a physical phenomena that can be detected, recorded and analyzed in the right circumstances. It appears to be a low frequency pressure wave somehow generated by a bigfoot. Probably vibrations in the airway and lungs. The BF was not visible, behind cover, but the amplitude of the pressure wave was quite powerful. There was no mistaking something was happening. Although the frequency of the infrasound was below the recording range of the recorder, objects in the pack the recorder was mounted on, seemed to have rattled together at a higher frequency with the passing infrasound pressure waves resulting in a secondary sound that was in the recorders range. By looking at a the recordings graphics trace during the event, the duration of the event and the frequency of the infra sound was measured. The infrasound seemed to be non directional and surround the victim. I believe that is because the frequencies involved are below the human hearing range so the ears could not determine the direction the sound originated from. Because of ambient sounds: running water, footsteps, pack noise, the exact number of infrasound blasts cannot be determined but we believe there were at least 6. One in particular, when the researcher was not moving and there was no background noise, produced the best analysis results. That particular blast lasted 5.22 seconds. It started at 4.22 hz and ramped up in frequency to 10.69 hz at the end of the 5.22 second blast. The average frequency during the 5.22 second blast was 6.7 hz. This was the second and less strong blast experienced by the researchers who stopped walking at the first blast. Several others followed until one researcher started talking to the BF and asked it to stop but give a friendlier sign it was around. The blasts stopped as requested. 8 minutes later I found a 15 inch footprint on the trail ahead of us. Those frequencies are well below the low frequency range of most field recorders. That explains why zapping or infrasound recordings do not reveal any audio. The blasts always started at a low frequency in the 4 to 5 hz range and ramp up to a higher frequency. I suspect they are trying to find the frequency that gives the desired result in the victim. The durations are in the 3 to 5 second range. It is of course unknown what the objective was on the part of the BF. Because of our findings, it is suggested that anyone who has recorded a zapping or infrasound event retain the recording and review it with graphics audio software. When you know what to look for you may have physical evidence even though the sound playback did not have anything you could hear. I will post the graphics trace later so you can see what the event looks like on a graphics trace. When you know what to look for you can find them. It cannot be determined if the event would have been visible on the recording without objects in the pack rattling together. Because the infrasound pressure waves were so strong, perhaps the recorder might have displayed the passing waves anyway like wind noise. But it will take another recorded event to determine that. The location of this event was 300 yards from the chest slapping encounter I reported previously. That leads me to believe that there is something in this area that the resident BF wish to protect or drive humans away from. If you feel fear, dread, anxiety, and a strong desire to leave the area, get your recorder running and avoid making background sounds. You may be able to get the infrasound on recording. More to follow when I have it. R R

I'm not personally offended at all so no worries there, but I couldn't disagree with you more about why they need to be discovered by science, as well as the particulars surrounding that event. I hunt Bears in season. With that said, you don't go blasting every species that walks into a camp. Obviously a Bear could be a threat, but I'd only shoot one out of season if the situation was dire. I usually shoot in the air and scare them away.........and then advise my neighbor to secure his/her garbage better. But a completely different mindset between shooting a nuisance black bear and shooting a type specimen! Project Grendel is about proving the existence of Sasquatch to science by any means necessary, including harvesting a type specimen. But I'd be more happy finding a skull in the woods, that was recent and not fossilized. Then we would not have to kill one, but unlike you I think it's extremely important that this very special and possibly rare species is recognized and protected. And if that means killing one to protect the rest? I think that is a noble cause. And my videos prove you wrong. Tom Biscardi with his ape suit in a freezer photos had a CNN press conference in 2 weeks from his announcement that he had a Sasquatch body. Todd Standing is selling seats at a local auditorium to view his Sasquatch movie and the press is all over it! Nobody seems to have a problem getting the presses attention concerning a body.... I would definitely take my type specimen to science first and then let them deal with the media how they wanted. I would donate it to science or let the government take possession of it. Although I would keep a body part for myself in a very safe undisclosed location to make sure there were no black ops conspiracies that made the body vanish. If the body was mine and I did make money off of it? I would use that money to start a conservation fund for the species or donate it to a like minded organization already established.

Your dead wrong on all accounts......... 1) My desire to kill one is fully based on our current understanding of conservation, and is not based on fame or fortune. 2) Your pretty sure it is illegal to kill one? I've called and talked to the US fish and wildlife, you need a permit to harvest or harass non game species for the purpose of scientific study, you also need credentials that qualifies you to do so. But this only applies to US wildlife refuges.......... Places such as the National Forests are administered by state fish and game agencies, and differ with each state. So what constitutes harassment? Chasing them around at night with a thermal camera? Wood knocking? Call blasting? I'm sure about nothing concerning this issue, and add in fifty states? It becomes a lawyer's nightmare. 3) Human? Does anyone want to date Patty? While it may come to pass upon examining a type speciman that it is a fellow member of the genus Homo? I'm positive it will not be classified as our own species. We would have to make new rules concerning what our understanding of a human is, based on DISCOVERY. If laws post type specimen were enacted to protect this species forever I would be behind that 200%. But I think that prosecution on the grounds of murder for a undiscovered species of giant proto hominid, that the government denied existed would be thrown out. I certainly take my chances concerning this issue with confidence. 4) You contradict yourself, if big industry doesn't want Sasquatch to be discovered? How can that be good for Sasquatch? Big industry doesn't want to add Sasquatch to their environmental impact studies because they are stealing HABITAT from Sasquatch!!!!!!!!!!! Discovery of Sasquatch will absolutely hurt big industry such as Weyerhauser, which will be a WIN for Sasquatch. In closing, that is the whole point of this, discovery leads to conservation. I have challenged people many of times to show me a species that the endangered species act has hurt as opposed to helped. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endangered_Species_Act Exemptions can and do occur. The ESA requires federal agencies to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) if any project occurs in the habitat of a listed species. An example of such a project might be a timber harvest proposed by the US Forest Service. If the timber harvest could impact a listed species, a biological assessment is prepared by the Forest Service and reviewed by the FWS or NMFS or both. The question to be answered is whether a listed species will be harmed by the action and, if so, how the harm can be minimized. If harm cannot be avoided, the project agency can seek an exemption from the Endangered Species Committee, an ad hoc panel composed of members from the executive branch and at least one appointee from the state where the project is to occur. Five of the seven committee members must vote for the exemption to allow taking (to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or significant habitat modification,[44] or to attempt to engage in any such conduct) of listed species.[45] Long before the exemption is considered by the Endangered Species Committee, the Forest Service, and either the FWS or the NMFS will have consulted on the biological implications of the timber harvest. The consultation can be informal, to determine if harm may occur; and then formal if the harm is believed to be likely. The questions to be answered in these consultations are whether the species will be harmed, whether the habitat will be harmed and if the action will aid or hinder the recovery of the listed species.[46] Northern Spotted Owl If harm is likely to occur, the consultation evaluates whether "reasonable and prudent alternatives" exist to minimize harm. If an alternative does not exist, the FWS or NMFS will issue an opinion that the action constitutes "jeopardy" to the listed species either directly or indirectly. The project cannot then occur unless exempted by the Endangered Species Committee. The Committee must make a decision on the exemption within 30 days, when its findings are published in the Federal Register. The findings can be challenged in federal court. In 1992, one such challenge was the case of Portland Audubon Society v. Endangered Species Committee heard in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.[47] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Who speaks for Sasquatch? Who lobbies Congress to protect their lands? Who fights timber sales for them? Nobody.........because MYTHS don't have a voice. Neither do Pixies, Gnomes or Trolls.........but the Lynx does, the Grizzly bear does, the Wolf does, the Woodland Caribou does, the Bull Trout does........ Xion Comrade? The naive mindset is your own, not mine.

^Yeah, one sells more books and DVD's than the other. It's good to know the difference for anyone coming into this field. Just don't expect any of it to bag a Sasquatch.

Watched the second show last night. Why would you carry flares via backpack deep into the woods? They are heavy, do not last long, and like someone mentioned previously, what happened when he ran out of them? Since he is still around, obviously nothing. The BF face in the brush looks very fake to me. Puppet like in that only the eyes seemed to move. That structure thing related to BF is interesting to me. The active area I have been working has none of that and the locals do not break off tree tops. I do find rock stacks and stick glyphs on stumps. Tribal differences or human activity both here and there? Another thing I cannot determine until I see a BF doing a rock stack.

I want to apologize to the mods on that last post. I forget kids are on here