Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/28/2014 in all areas

  1. Lots of jockeying for position and posturing on either side of the kill/no-kill position. I disagree, fundamentally, with the opening post, in that a bigfoot carcass will make profound waves in the scientific community. Within a few years, the discovery could change fundamental land-use and permissions upon vast tracts of federal land. The claimed physical evidence has been found wanting, and clowns on the left, jokers on the right have been affronts to serious study. It's no wonder accredited scientific efforts have not been forthcoming. Those in the public eye, at outlandish press conferences or reality television shows, discourage study from creditable scientific fronts. Yet when some amateur researcher proffers the carcass of an unclassified primate or hominid, or a severed limb or head of such, the scientific world will come to an abrupt standstill. And those would be interesting times, my friends.
    1 point
  2. If it is I guarantee you it's blurry like a waking dog's eye. Probably has red circles on it too.
    1 point
  3. I agree there too, If they're doing a complete 180 every so often, it only shows their information can't be trusted.
    1 point
  4. ^I knew exactly where you were goin' with that one! Yeah, but still couldn't be Bob H. ;-)
    1 point
  5. Yes, you are all making my point. Even Bill Munns can't put an absolute size on it. It seems strange that you would compare something you saw, to the size of something that is awash in so much controversy. Why don't you just give us your estimate of how tall 'Ol Grey' is, instead of giving us more confusion? "Officer, why did you pull me over?" "Well, you were doing 10 over the silver Impala in the right lane."
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...