Leaderboard

Agreed. Before chameleons were DISCOVERED, the scientific world might never have believed independent eye movement was possible, either. My point is simply that to discount something based on every other known species at this time might feel prudent, but we really can't know until we know. Ya know? Everything about BF is weird. It's up to science to explain it, not discount everything out of hand due to some misguided need to fit it inside an existing biological box. It's all about discovery, right?

So- if the building doesn't have a chipped tooth, how does the cat fare?

Depends. If your goal is death by dead horse, then maybe..

Lets be clear what the claims are, and work from there shall we? It doesn't look to me like Bipto is beating around the bush about what he thinks is making the tree's fall. These are super large, super fast and super strong wood ninja's.

You are applying non-science, to a topic, and calling it science. If I said 'Here is a doctored photo of a spaceship landing and dropping off unicorns, and the real photos were stolen by people who didn't want us to know Unicorns were really Aliens. Therefore, there are spaceships dropping off unicorns in the woods. Unless you can prove otherwise.' Then you'd think I was being silly. But as soon as 'Giant Human' gets into the mix, it is all of a sudden a valid scientific endeavor? There is no fossil evidence of giant humans. The stories are written to make you think there is evidence. They have fooled some of you. Bipedalism has it's limits, spreading a huge mass over two points of support is taxing on lower limbs, spines, and hearts.

Don't buy it at all...

Well, I'm so bored that I feel compelled to weigh in on someone I've never heard of discussing shutting down his Youtube channel I've never watched. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE&feature=kp

Front and center is one thing. However grasping at straws and attributing things to bigfoot that just could not possibly be do nothing but harm your cause. When ridiculous bigfoot claims go unchallenged they end up in the popular ( bigfoot wise) knowledge base. This is bad because it leads to things like Matt Moneymaker on television claiming that bigfoots have bioluminescent eyes. Encouraging people to come up with various ways that an alleged event could be caused by bigfoot regardless of how preposterous that scenario might be is nothing more than bigfoot folklore creation at ground zero. I thought people in this thread wanted more reality and truth.

But which species was it?