Leaderboard

All mammals share a biological fact, we all have a front and a back. One Dogo vs one Bigfoot doesn't have much of a chance. Add to that if a Bigfoot like other dangerous game like Bears or Cats look for a defensive place to pick a fight. Such as a large tree or rock that they can back up to? It can be tough for the dog. And there are lots of those in the mountainous forested regions in which Bigfoot is reported to roam. But by the time you get to four dogs, any time you even remotely square to the threat of one dog even with your back to a wall? You open your back up to a attack. If you hunt your dogs together they begin to work in concert, much like wolves, as a single enveloping entity. And that is just so tough to defend against. I know this much, which is sad to contemplate, but even if the Bigfoot defeated all four Dogos? He would be maimed and bleeding and hurt and I feel would be easy to track. And it would be imperative to track and dispatch it because you wouldn't want that pissed off animal stumbling into a group of picnickers. This would have to happen some place remote, but you could still bracket the chase and have flankers out ahead of the chase. It would be costly, and require a team of men. I still have my yaggi antenna and collars, newer gps tracking equipment is also available. And lastly it would be a horrible death for a Bigfoot, a death of a thousand cuts. I'd much rather take one cleanly or better yet find one dead naturally. But obviously the bar is set high for a lone hunter to be at the right place at the right time. Or canine friends are faster, tougher, more attuned to their senses and just flat give us an edge. Of course with this comes tons of dedication, cost and man hours for the human master. Ultimately it's your dog and you are responsible to him to be bringing up the rear and find him if he is lost, hurt or dead. Many days and nights I just wanted a hot shower, hot food and a bed. But if you don't know where your dogs are you keep going......it's a bond.

norseman & Wv Footer Chasing these creatures with dogs is a good idea ,but the dogs will not have a chance and will end up dead or be running back with tails tuck between their back legs. I have always had this idea that these creatures have always runned with coyotes or have used them as hunting partners or maybe even as pets. I know that this sounds strange but I am sure that there are otherswho can relate to to this. I have always taken my dogs with me and they always seem to be on that high alert and when these creatures are around my dogs seem to stay closer to me and not wonder. I also have a bond with my dogs and believe me if these creatures were to ever hurt my dogs. I would go after them with venges and they know this. I have no problem to ever kill one of these creatures if it ever come down to it. Even though I might have said some strange things about them and what I have expierance I have no problem of killing them. I have thought about it many times and have talked to certain people that I know about it during bow season. I understand what Bibto has gone through and some times there are things that are hard to explain. People some times want to much from what was observed. These creatures realy do not leave to much as evidence unless you are able to get a shot in with a rifle or a cross bow or a bow. Yes, a body is all that it will take to prove their existance and the problem with that is ? How human they look. The longer you take aim the more time you have to think about what you are about to do. I sure as heck do not want that guilt do be on my soul or heart. I would rather wonder the woods looking for a corpes to bring that back then to kill one. I just can not agree that these creatures are wood apes.

I offered my opinion, you can think what you want. Sure dogs are used to hunt bears and Mt. Lions, but we are talking about a Bigfoot. Your comparing apples to oranges. I have never read a sighting report where a Bear did not run away, and I am talking Black and Grizzly bears, just before a Bigfoot was sighted. Also, the countless reports of supposed great dogs, that were useless after encountering a Bigfoot. There are also reports of Dogs being found dead up in the crotch of a tree. The only thing that could do that would be a Human, Bigfoot, or maybe a Leopard? What I have offered here is in Hard copy in sighting reports. Uninformed? Hardly... Is there any hard copy evidence out there of someone letting a group of Hunting Dogs loose to hunt a Bigfoot, because I would like to see it. I doubt if anyone would risk their dogs lives for such a venture, fearing what could happen to their dogs. JMO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Cstl-8xHAE Starting at ~:59:30, another incident of gunfire at a less than positively ID'd target.

lol, thank you sir, I thought you'd appreciate that. yes folks, that buttered one gets a lot of mileage in the Pit......all the more reason to join the pmp and find out why

I know you hunt the area all around Area X's vast 10 acres. Your perspective on that part of the world is appreciated! t.

I have a question(s) for Darrell. While I can see you are basing you conclusion on the final proof alone ( a body), I'm curious what your explantion is for thousands of people across centuries and of all races seem to see the same exact creature time after time? If BF was a figment of their imagination, then would'nt there be the same number of Unicorn sightings? Or Leprachauns for that matter. What causes all these people to see the same thing with similar behavior patterns and vocalizations? Would'nt the Vocals alone be wildly sporatic if everyone was making them up? What's leaving all those footprints with dermal ridges that Jimmy Chilcut examined and proclaimed to be so realistic, no one but an expert in primate prints could even hope to fake? Is everyone who is faking prints that good? Why do people find prints in areas 100's of miles from any town or city. Random pranksters wasting time and money to lay them out in the middle of nowhere? And last of all, the thing that really bugs me, when people say that sightings are just a bear being mistaken for BF. If you take your 5 year old to the zoo and he looks in the Gorrilla pen and shouts "bear" , I think you're in a load of trouble. Any kindergartner can tell the difference easily. I find that claim to be the most insulting to even the most basic intelligence if you get my drift. Anyway's I see your point about ultimate proof, I'm just curious how you explain these things away as nothing. I'm trying to write this with a neutral tone so we can explore both sides of the fence. My mind is still open so give me good reasons why you have reached your conclusion.