Leaderboard

At this point those that NEED to know where X is KNOW! Why do we have to keep beating this topic of disclosure and revelation of research areas. I oppose this line of questioning on the grounds that if Branson wanted us to know he'd send us the plat to post up personally.

Shortly after the husband passed (2013) she began having problems with homo sapien trespassers. After the big guys started visiting, the trespassing stopped.

How do you suggest evidence be vetted? Remember, this needs to be something available to, and within the means of, the people who have their boots on the ground who obtain the evidence. Many of those people are going into the woods, parks, fields etc with no clue there is any such thing as a sasquatch, so how are they going to prepare to do this vetting you want? Who is going to do the vetting? A bunch of people hiding behind screen names on a forum? Who is qualified? There really are NO experts, just some folks who think they are. Even the people who are professionals in the sense that they derive their income from bigfoot research, which are pretty few, fall short of being "experts." So what is this vetting process you're suggesting, who will perform it, and how will it be paid for? MIB

Where to begin...... 1) From day one you have attacked the NAWAC, Project Grendel and the pro kill stance in general. And while you were not able to dig up any dirt on me, you and I traded barbs in my Kill Club thread quite a while ago philosophically. But for the NAWAC this isn't true...... You have done your best to undermine public opinion against the NAWAC! 2) Specifically? Area X ! You openly admit you do not know where area X is.....but you SUGGEST it's Mr. Branson's 10 acre plot. That's simply slanderous....... 3) The Echo incident. STOP! You feel pro kill proponents are bad people, bad people shouldn't carry guns.......fine! That's your opinion! The bill of rights disagrees with you! Get over it!!!!!! It is not illegal for me to carry a gun in the woods because I believe in Bigfoot, Zombies or the Mothman. 4) Pro kill proponents are in it for the money? What money? You would be better off taking your money and playing powerball! 5) There are no squatches in area X? Again you have no idea where area X is! Do you deny that reports come from this region of Oklahoma? 6) What about you? What did the tribal leaders teach you about them that made you shuck your evil ways?

seems like yuchi covered this above in post 1518...... we know by their own accounts that expose them. we can promote , or at least suggest safety by calling them out on it. NRA promotes safety, as a member I can at least encourage it too. the responsibility ultimately falls on the one that squeezes the trigger. as you well know, bullets don't have a pause or rewind . neither does death . and I agree, sasquatch hunting may very well be absurd.

Norseman, Let us agree to disagree as I have no personal animosity for you and actually believe you're of good heart, a bit misguided but nonetheless, good people and I wish only the best for you and yours. To that end, I would offer a few thoughts and some history (based upon my personal experiences) regarding this hunting/killing effort of a UHS/Sasquatch: My less than flattering comments regarding opinions on NAWAC's operations are predicated upon their own (written & audio/video) publications. While not pretty, it is factually based, after all, they said it, no one else made it up from out of whole cloth and as a fellow once said, "it is what it is". During my pro-killer days there were some people associated in our group that "talked the talk" with using the lingo, equipment, and posturing of someone that wanted everyone to think they were the Chuck Norris of UHS/Sasquatch hunters. One dude in particular carried this to the next level as in talking with him, you'd have thought Jim Corbett was one of his pupils. During three (3) seperate events, he abandoned his post just as things got rather intense, leaving the rest of us in the lurch, had things "got western" at those times. I'm talking about running out of the forest and back to his truck (2X) and even asking a fellow pro-killer to escort him back to his truck in another instance. IMO, the guy was a total fraud and it was fortunate he didn't shoot someone out of irrational fear for things that are in the forest. When/if you have a close encounter of the UHS/Sasquatch kind, I wager it will elicit a flood of emotions, the likes of which you have never before experienced. If, it is a hostile situation, you will have the intense understanding of your own mortality as it is the ultimate rush when faced with something that has the capacity to kill you in a NYS and is far more intelligent than you had ever imagined. If, it is a passive situation, you will experience a feeling of understanding (about a whole lot of things) that will be of a magnitude never imagined and come away with the ability and cognizance of what it truly entails to go through life, walking in a quiet grace. Been there, done that, with both, option B is the best choice. Kasi Mek-e-oo

Oh jeeeeez..........

@ Inc, as far as what it has produced "it's called discussion" which is why I thought a forum like this exists. I do believe the people who frequent this forum come here to "discuss" what they've experienced. Ask questions, compare notes, what they've experienced, etc. Seriously, if any of us had hard core, set in stone evidence and the mystery was solved then we would be discussing what "is known as fact" until then this is all we have "discussion of what we have experienced" . Hypothetical as it all may be, it's still discussion.

I tried to plus that but I'm out. I'll add that hallucinations are also a problem when you get them on film and/or record them and can play them back at will. MIB