Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/21/2014 in all areas

  1. I think Norse said it best that those who need to know where area X is, Know where area X is. I would think disclosing it's location would bring in more onlookers, hunters, and who knows what else! and would therefore increase the possibility of someone other than the intended target being shot. The Branson family would not want that to happen, and neither would any NAWAC personnel. Citing rules and regs is fine and find out exactly what they are for the area you will be hunting, but when it comes down to it, the person with the firearm is ultimately responsible for his or her own actions. Ideally anyone that hunts should know at the very least the basic operation and capability of their firearm, they should do a visual survey of the AO to see if there is evidence of hikers, campers, and/or other hunters, and last but not least, make sure to identify your target when you have it in your sights! Common sense folks! You might be surprised to see just how much trouble you can avoid when you use it!
    3 points
  2. I don't know about anyone else, but I'd like to do some squatchin on Yuchi's lease, just to be sure there aren't any squatches on it. If there is any evidence to be had, my team could find it.
    2 points
  3. For me it all points to the humans involved in the subject as opposed to the subject itself.
    1 point
  4. Really? I've read alot of papers that put the exact locations of the specimen's locality. GPS coords. Study really isn't valid if you say 'we found this, but we can't tell you where'
    1 point
  5. Wow painthorse. That's horrible. What's wrong with people ? Yuchi, no has a right to go on someone else's property without permission.
    1 point
  6. Really?----------------> It doesn't matter! -> What does matter -> is that my property is "POSTED". Without an invite, as in -> "having permission from the land owner" NO ONE belongs on this property. Now, do you want to try and twist that answer into something else? So I'm done in reference to that subject, it's a simple answer with simple logic. Other than that it's going to get personal and that's against the rules. PERIOD.
    1 point
  7. I had originally though Mr. Branson had gone to a Bigfoot Convention and started talking about the location. It was on Youtube and stuff I think.
    1 point
  8. At this point those that NEED to know where X is KNOW! Why do we have to keep beating this topic of disclosure and revelation of research areas. I oppose this line of questioning on the grounds that if Branson wanted us to know he'd send us the plat to post up personally.
    1 point
  9. When you look upon the subject and observe how it responds, there's an awesomeness/respectfullness that permeates the very marrow of your bones. It's akin (but also somewhat different) from the feeling when you walk in a military cemetary and understand why all those lying there, did what they did.
    1 point
  10. Points concerning gun safety are axiomatic to me...a gun owner and shooter for 45 years. My point is that it is hardly our business to police adults from our armchairs and does nothing to further the real discussion of evidence in X.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...