Leaderboard

I find your signature line ironic in light of your position. Myself, I believe that not all of reality has yet been offered up on the sacred altar of science. Just to reiterate, we haven't heard from Renae what has led her to this belief. Believe or disbelieve what you will, I just don't understanding how you can accuse her of illogic without more information.

We don't know what evidence and/or experience(s) led Renae to her conclusion. Just because you find her statement distasteful doesn't mean you get to invent a motivation for it. ETA- The folks who can't reconcile the existence of physical evidence with Renae's "spirit creature theory" and use that to show she is being illogical need to re-read her actual statement in the first post here:

FWIW, Spiritual might be kind of a vague description for an acknowledgement of existence that she doesn't understand given the present paradigm or it's a euphemism trying not to totally alienate her viewing audience...

SweetSusiq- I went back to review your original sighting account and had some questions about several details, and this one in particular: Your original account states that the creature ducked behind what you believe was a stump and watched you drive past: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/10882-sighting-on-hwy7-in-texas/?p=128380 And later, in that same thread:http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/10882-sighting-on-hwy7-in-texas/?p=128406 And then similarly here: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/665-bff-member-sightings-please-no-questions-or-discussion-of-a-members-sightings/?p=128414 In the more recent 'Dogmen and Bigfoot, Friends or Foes?' thread, you described it's actions thusly: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/46258-dogmen-and-bigfoot-friends-or-foes/?p=823270 Now, here in this thread, you say it did something different: http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/48010-ptsd-and-bf-sitings/?p=861820 I don't think anyone could fault me for being a bit confused. Could you please clarify, for all of use who are genuinely interested in your sighting: Which of these statements best describes the creature's actions that day? Which one(s) did you relate in the interview you gave? Why do the different accounts contain these discrepencies to begin with? Thanks in advance!

This image reminds me of these convos. No one is getting anywhere, but theres a whole lot of effort being put into that nothing. Those who claim to have access to a sasquatch claim they need no evidence, or don't want to share it. I think it's an excuse. If there were sasquatch on my property reqularly, or any other uncataloged animal - my actions would be slightly different. Just sayin. The other comparison to this image is, its funny to watch. (a lot like these threads)