Leaderboard

Yes, The bigfoot hanging around my inner city dumpster communicate with me thru nice thoughts. They are extraordinary creatures, I know from the nice thoughts they exude. I know they're all about my inner city digs because they accept the gifts I offer them. I can't and won't actually see them accept these gifts because that would be just rude if I tried. I don't like the wolf-faced creatures, because they make noises I can't identify on my digital recorder constantly. I prefer the regular, not type-III bigfoot because they regularly accept my gift offerings. I never see them, and wouldn't ever consider being mean and filming them. Still, they leave me with calm, wonderful thoughts of First Person interaction, because, well, just because. It's so great. Don't even think of questioning my experiences, because that would be, just mean. Don't be a meaney, but do believe everything I tell you. Because they are such wonderful creatures.

Again we have trail camera hits, just like we have video. What difference does it make? If the PGF is not going to sway you? Nothing will...,,.other than a slab monkey. If your goal is to prove the species to be real? You best not be investing a lot of time and energy in this medium, unless it's helping you bag one. Sorry it is what it is!

" There's no report that I have read - and I doubt you'll find many, if any, who have read more - that left me with a scintilla of possibility that they saw and misidentified a known animal. They were badly impaired; flat lying...or they saw what they saw; and I never read anything in a report that would lead me to seriously suspect the first two." DWA In other words, you believe every report you read? If not a single report has ever left you with the impression of a mistaken identity and you never seriously suspect mitigating factors like dishonesty or intoxication, then you must truly believe every single report you read. Huh, that explains a lot... " It's a well-known psychological principle that people whose minds are operating properly, and the reports leave no reason to believe they weren't, don't see things they are familiar with and morph them into the unknown" DWA Citation please. I can link to you peer reviewed papers that state exactly the opposite. Human recall is notoriously unreliable. Also, you feel you can discern someones mental health from reading a report on the BFRO? Seriously? Sub-clinical psychosis can be ruled out by what you read on a bigoot database on the Internet? That's impressive.

I believe that the skeptical are tired of grandiose claims being made without evidence being presented. I believe it's possible the creature exists, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to buy all of the nonsensical claims made by some here. Although I'm not privy to the supposed instances observed, it's just too much to believe for the most part. If the creatures are so thick on your property that you can't walk out of your back door without tripping over them, you should be able to offer evidence, IMO. Without supporting evidence, these claims are nothing but mere tales. Skeptics, or the skeptical proponents, desire proof of claims. This is as it should be.

Not every one is true, but are you sure all of them are not true? You're trying to prove a negative, which is not possible.

I can only think of a very few BFF member skeptics who completely dismiss the possibility of BF existing. I can think of less than ten. Most are skeptical about the extraordinary claims, as I am. I was gonna give examples, but I think most people know what I'm talking about...

No issue with honest skeptics here. I have an issue with dishonest scoffers who call themselves skeptics and masquerade outright abuse of witnesses as "honest questions." MIB

Dmaker, the floor is yours. I'm off to get the popcorn.