Leaderboard

It does if you believe that there is congruency in multiple eyewitness encounters like some here do. (Note that some here believe they can tell the truth of a witness report just by reading it - no investigation required.) Bigfootery is becoming ever more similar to business in general - buzzwords replace rational thought. It makes a weird sort of sense when you understand that many actually do make money off the subject.

I don't agree with most of the conclusions of that article. Appreciate you posting the link - it was an interesting read, but I think context of intelligence, abilities (physical and sensory), etc are not really given their proper measure in that article. There are no other animals as intelligent as humans - there are lots of animals better suited for many tasks or surviving in certain situations, but give most humans a little time to adapt and learn and they will outlive and still be the top of the food chain. Sure, a bear can kill us, but they are not more intelligent. On the whole, humans are far more intelligent, adaptable and aware than any animal we know of. And it's not just societal, although society allows us combined knowledge and platforms to increase knowledge, and likely over time adapt our brains in ways they never used to be used. Anyway, my point is that to our knowledge, there are no more intelligent beings on earth or anywhere else.

If Science would just have read the thousands of reports I've read, they would never question anything. All they would have to do is ask me, as I've read thousands of reports, and can now fully understand the meaning of esoteric reports, since I've read thousands of them. Why don't they just ask me? Afterall, I'm a scientist, I swear. Just ask me.

Yes, The bigfoot hanging around my inner city dumpster communicate with me thru nice thoughts. They are extraordinary creatures, I know from the nice thoughts they exude. I know they're all about my inner city digs because they accept the gifts I offer them. I can't and won't actually see them accept these gifts because that would be just rude if I tried. I don't like the wolf-faced creatures, because they make noises I can't identify on my digital recorder constantly. I prefer the regular, not type-III bigfoot because they regularly accept my gift offerings. I never see them, and wouldn't ever consider being mean and filming them. Still, they leave me with calm, wonderful thoughts of First Person interaction, because, well, just because. It's so great. Don't even think of questioning my experiences, because that would be, just mean. Don't be a meaney, but do believe everything I tell you. Because they are such wonderful creatures.

No issue with honest skeptics here. I have an issue with dishonest scoffers who call themselves skeptics and masquerade outright abuse of witnesses as "honest questions." MIB

It's a big claim........ We are not talking about a new species of salamander. We are talking about a 8' tall bipedal ape or primitive man depending on who you talk too. We do have evidence in the fossil record of similar creatures existing in the past. But no fossils have been found to exist in North America. Nor do we have any recent physical evidence supporting the existence of the creature. We have plaster casts, anecdotal reports, photos, audio and video. Nothing thus far is compelling enough for the scientific community as a whole to invest time and energy looking for a hairy wild man in North America. We need a body or a portion there of for science to sit up and take notice, but for most at this point and time? It's a fairy tale. I find some of the evidence compelling, as well as my own experience . But Iam not most.....

If bf exists there is really no logical reason why at least one wouldn't be caught on a game cam at some point in time. The many reasons (from the looney to the not so looney) we hear of why bf aren't captured by game cams really don't hold any water with me and it's one of the reasons I am skeptical of its existence. t.