Leaderboard

There are a few consistencies to reports, things like making no noise while walking, tree peeking, quietly observing, rock throwing, bluff charging, hanging out/following river systems and standing statue still when being looked at directly. One in particular I have noted is tree shaking. I have taken 2 private reports and am aware of 2 others from fellow investigators from northern MI of witnesses watching a creature shaking several trees violently while vocalizing ( all of the witnesses reported that the creature was whooping ) for a few seconds then turning and walking back into a swamp. Also I have noticed a habitat consistency that has repeatedly been affirmed by my mapping of the areas where there is a concentration of good reports. All of these areas that consistently produce reports and findings throughout years indicate that Sasquatch in the lower pen like expansive stream fed evergreen bog forest ( mostly of a spruce and cedar composition ) that is bordered by agriculture. I have also noted that the reports from these bogs when viewed from a large area map appear to rim around the edge of the swamp forest with the exception of a few intimidation reports from deep within the swamp by hardcore bear hunters.

Paulides' clusters do not exclusively consist of missing who are never found. A significant number are found alive, and often under strange circumstances, almost as if they're being returned. If your operating hypothesis is that bigfoot is responsible for the disappearances related in the Missing 411 series, then bigfoot must also be responsible for those who reappear. If so, something other than decapitation and dismemberment to satisfy a sasquatch bloodlust is probably going on.

I have read in past BFF posts that some people who are hiking in the woods suddenly experience an anxiety/panic attack and run towards their vehicle or campsite or until they exit an area (or zone) deemed spooky or threatening. These zones have been called “death zones†in previous posts. These experiencers did not see a BF, but were speculating that it could have been because the hiking area was squatchy. I think even the original posters will agree that panic attacks in the woods (even squatchy woods) is not evidence of BF presence. The mystery of panic attacks in the woods is not new and has been written about before without any conclusion on its causation (whether psychological or attributed to environmental/external factors). An article that documented this mystery and used stories from Europe is titled the “The Landscapes of Panic†by Patrick Harpur (from 2001). See link below. https://www.scribd.com/doc/236245366/Landscape-of-Panic-FT141-Patrick-Harpur https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mythfolk/conversations/topics/902 I find it interesting that some panic attacks in the woods appear suddenly with no obvious or seen external causation. I understand why some people want to attribute this panic and anxiety sensation to infra-sound from BF, but that is not the case in those European cases mentioned by Harpur where there has was never a claim of BF presence. The mystery of panic attacks in the woods is itself an interesting topic (without the need for BF presence). Has anybody done research on this area? How common is this phenomenon and what are the prevailing explanations for the panic? Are all panic attacks in the woods the same or are there many flavors? With regard to the relevance to BF research, we could ask those who claimed to have encountered a BF, how many had a panic attack and ran instead of just being frozen with fear or just reacted normally to an unknown encounter? How common is a panic attack with those who encounter a BF? Based on the cases that I have read, it appears to me that eyewitness experience fear, and the flight (not fight) reaction (especially with close encounters), but I would not call that panic. Panic defined as: a sudden overpowering fright; also: acute extreme anxiety. b : a sudden unreasoning terror often accompanied by mass flight).

Believing is nonsense. People can believe in many things, some not so great. I genuinely have no idea why anybody would believe in this creatures existence if they hadn't seen one or some kind of sign that they were pretty certain of pointed towards it. And I feel even more strongly about that given the last 10 years of looking in to the mixer and seeing first hand the kind of circus that unfortunately follows the subject around.

Truth? In the time I've been here I haven't seen you add anything to a conversation, all I see is your snarky one line quips and comments taking away, distracting and derailing topics ... ending discussions I would like to see continue because I might learn something. Are you here for any reason other than to stroke your ego by intellectually bullying others? That's a serious question, not the insult it probably looks like. I'm trying to solve the puzzle, not just talk about it as a form of entertainment. I don't care about your faux-intellectual wrangling. I want to hear from the witnesses. Y' know what? Some are indeed full of crap. My ego is not wrapped up in abusing people just because I don't believe them. I listen, I judge, I move on. Nowhere on that list is pronouncing my judgment. Maybe I don't belong here. Folks here have chased most of the witnesses off and gagged the rest. If you think about it, without the witnesses, a bigfoot discussion is pretty much a mental masturbation exercise. That's not what I came here for. People wonder why BF hasn't been proven. The conduct right here on BFF illustrates the answer. Ego ahead of understanding. MIB