Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/29/2014 in all areas

  1. What is it they say about great minds Nathan ?
    1 point
  2. ^^^That, and if you can show that not all such things are BF related, it follows that BF doesn't exist, or none of the phenomena are attributable to BF. We can see this at work in the form of Drew's question. "So", he might conclude, "Because people have panic attacks in their beds at night in urban areas, this tends to argue that...." Well, actually, it tends to show exactly nothing much, except that it is this kind of amateur sniping that makes serious discussion around here so unlikely. Note how he studiously avoids considering the real question, because, that's right YOU CAN'T GET A PANIC ATTACK FROM SOMETHING THAT HE KNOWS DOESN'T EXIST! So, that sort of shuts down his ability to consider the very premise, in its entirety, doesn't it? (Yes, it does)
    1 point
  3. When I had my encounter my mental state was more surprise than anything else. I was in my truck on a major hiway, and really was not feeling like I was in danger, partially because I had the idea for a while that I was seeing a pile of dirt in the road as I was approaching it. At any moment I could have stomped the gas and my trusty 350 V8 with its Edlebrock enchancements would have jetted me out of there. So I felt fairly safe, even if after a while I started thinking that this thing was nearly half the size and weight of my truck, maybe I should be careful... IOW I don't think you can count on fearful in all sightings.
    1 point
  4. <Posts containing religious content have been hidden for editing> Thank God.
    1 point
  5. The united states has a lot of public and protected lands now that are already protected for them to live on, national forest, nature preserves, greenways, state parks, national parks etc. Canada has very similar that if I am correct is called "Crown Lands". Animals cannot be put on an endangered list without 1. being a known/classified animal and 2. a habitat, population study would be needed to decide if they were in fact threatened by low population. I do not see the population/distribution study going very well with the Sasquatch even if they were classified as a known animal today. I do not believe they will be going extinct unless we cut down all the forest. We do not cut down all the forest, they are managed so that the cut areas are regrowing to maturity while others are being cut, so they may have to move around some to stay in mature forest but I believe they will always be some mature forest for them as they need it.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...