Eyewitness reports are unreliable. Memory is unreliable. Most reports are mis-identifications or outright fraud.
These are the most common responses to eyewitness reports. I get all that and think for the most part that is true. However, there are clearly outliers in the sighting reports that I have a hard time dismissing as one of the normal rationalizations.
Salubrious' experience is a perfect example. As a skeptic, I naturally try to categories his report, like all others I come across, as a mis-ID or fraud or unreliable for any number of reasons. Maybe he's on hallucigens or something. I don't know. However, Saubrious comes on here, puts his story out there, and sticks to it in a way I find rather credible. He seems pretty confident in what he saw and recounts his experience in a lucid, matter of fact, and articulate manner. Then, look at his behavior. Why would a fraudster, assuming for argument sake he was one, come on this board and participate in discussions over a long period of time, with over 2,000 posts? I'm not picking on Salurious, but only use him as an example of some one who has devoted a lot of energy to the subject of BF after coming out with his report. What does some one like him gain by doing so? That's why I can't discount his experience. I think he's looking for validation and answers to what he saw, same as many other witnesses who come forward and devote a lot of energy to the BF phenomenon over a long period of time without financial or other apparent motivation.
So, with all the problems surrounding memory and eyewitness accounts, all of which are legitimate, the outliers like Salurious' encounter are what keeps me interested in this subject.
MNSkeptic