Leaderboard

From what I am seeing, dumping in lots of data and then sifting through it, there is a pattern somewhat like slash-and-burn farmers. There will be one area with a concentration of encounters, then a break, then a new area, fairly distant from the first one, where a new concentration of encounters occurs. Buy the first chapter of the thesis over in the Northeast Encounters section - nevermind, you get to download it for free there. There's also some encounters that are consistent w/a wandering male. I have to say that it's pretty darn enjoyable when you're sorting through data and you randomly check on one or two attributes (e.g., 7' tall, red-haired Bigfoot) and then you find out that a group of these, from different counties, occurred over a 300 square mile area and a 10 or 15-year time span. But you've really got to slog through the data input and be prepared for a lot of disappointment.

Out of context, you can make any of these natural. Point being most were not and were associated with a research area that produced a sighting. I place these pictures here for serious researchers to utilize, not to argue their validity, thank you just the same. The pine snag at the stump was fifteen or more ft. down slope from the upslope prop. Nothing natural about that.