Leaderboard

He has betrayed himself with his own words. How did those shadowy "operatives" manage that? There's no need to invoke a conspiracy when the contradictions in the story are self-generated.

Those that believe they can and should kill one of these creatures "for science" must live in the capitol city of La La Land. Mankind comes in many various shapes, sizes, colors, and some have modes of travel that is not like that must of us use. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2698298/Turkish-family-walks-fours-scientists-say-dont-like-four-legged-animals-ARENT-example-reverse-evolution.html Where did you get the idea that man has always used and depended on fire and tools to survive? It would be murder.if their DNA showed they are relic humans. (But, again, if they are relic humans it would be a violation of this country's "Scientific Integrity" regulations, per Obama's Presidential Memo of 2010 for any scientist to publish anything about the examination of the body.) Residents of La La Land all share the same grossly erroneous beliefs that, (1) science & the federal government does not already know the DNA identity of these creature, (2) a body of one would be welcomed with opened arms by any scientist in the appropriate fields of study, (3) killing one would bring bring fame, glory and acclaim to all those who actually conspire to kill one of the creatures in a premeditated and deliberate manner and; (4) the worst that could happen to those involved would be a summons from a state game & fish enforcement officer for killing an animal for which there is no open season. I strongly suspect that you could not find or afford an attorney who would pursue your "charges" (or claim) against the G&F agency for not telling you about the "ape man" after reading your posts on this forum. The most voracious "pro-kill advocates" seem to be those who have never actually seen one of the creatures face-to-face, especially a young one that has not learned that some of "us" pose a serious and unjustified threat to them.

"So how do we separate the chaff from the wheat, when it seems the wheat are so outnumbered!" By doing your own field work and getting to understand these creatures in their own environment. It takes time and patience, and when you can determine the difference between the false and the truth on your own.

I agree with Bonehead & Crowlogic on this. When you consider the very "dramatic" Bigfoot encounter, along with Bob Garrets's dramatic "men in black" problems, related to his "dramatic" reports on Bigfoot campground violence, it all equals a big draw for Bigfoot Chronicles. Think about it, most people would rather listen to these exciting stories than the basic, run of the mill, Bigfoot research. These guys, like so many others, know what we want to hear.....BF encounters that are exciting and/ or dangerous.

Those two front toes are not actually way out in front by any means, it is as textbook a cougar track as one can ever expect to find randomly in the woods. The ground that track was in was pretty hard as well, which is what really impressed me. You aren't wrong however, what is really the case is that I really suck at taking accurate pictures of tracks, I will have to brain storm up some ways of improving for sure!.>.< My bad! We have had these critters running around this area before and after they declared them "extinct" from here. There are actually several of them, wouldn't surprise me if it was enough for some sort of long distance breeding population, seems like they got a real big range and never cause any trouble for anyone except the occasional farmer, but they never catch one I guess. What is remarkable is that they don't get shot up by all of these hunters who use dogs I figure. Probably the rarest big predatory mammal in these woods, much moreso than the bigfoot, and I would put money on that!

Good plan. Better yet, get your own logging company going and hire BF to be loggers. Big, powerful, live right there, and know what forest you need to keep for them to live in. Let them run down a deer for lunch break or just set up a buffet line instead of paying them. They might cause a ruckus when they come to town to cash their checks.

If you are serious about this topic, you don't waste time on those shows, and if you just HAVE to watch them, you do it with some awareness of what they are. Not science, not comprehensive information, not adding to the knowledge base (much). Sells a lot of soap though. Me, I don't need any soap. I should add as well: If you are using your impressions of those programs to extrapolate some greater commentary on the real issues that need examining, you are really yawing far wide of the mark, in my opinion.

The lack of discernment on reading the encounter database is a very hard thing to overcome, especially if the reader hasn't identified the deficiencies to begin with. I am convinced some have the ability, and some simply do not. Still, it can be learned. As a young law clerk i would summarize depositions for a very skiled trial lawyer. He would read them and often rewrite the summary. I was always amazed at what he could tease out of something i saw as very flat testimony, but i learned. This is a lot like that. Most read those and only take away the obvious, which is more easily waved away. The ability to really understand takes diligence and a bit of art as well. When you read that an E. European likens the smell to the moldy interior of a travel caravan, for instance, you have to know why that matters. That and a thousand other details that are all there for those with eyes. This is not so handily dismissed, i don't care much how the world has defeated your own personal expectations and timetable for confirmation. There is a greater perspective demanded.

Because they don't exist.......