Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. SweatyYeti

    SweatyYeti

    Passionate Member


    • Points

      4

    • Posts

      9,218


  2. MarkGlasgow

    MarkGlasgow

    Engaged Member


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      686


  3. LeafTalker

    LeafTalker

    Engaged Member


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      1,874


  4. southernyahoo

    southernyahoo

    Passionate Member


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      5,026


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/31/2015 in all areas

  1. Is this post actually suggesting that SO's vids and audio is legitimate? I'm obviously reading this wrong. Right?
    2 points
  2. The hairy people are very, very smart. They are every bit as smart as we are, and perhaps smarter. One sign of intelligence is a sense of humor, and they certainly have that. They joke and play tricks. A famous article from the Oregonian, dated July 16, 1924, says, “Oregon Indians at times have been greatly humiliated by the Seeahtiks’ [bigfoot’s] vulgar sense of humor….The Seeahtiks play practical jokes upon them….†The very obviously hand-drawn hand “print†on Sasquatch Ontario’s car was drawn by the BF as a joke. S.O. wanted a print, so they gave him one. In one of Sasquatch Ontario’s most recent videos, he videotapes a huge footprint on the slanted windshield of his car. What “hoaxer†would put a footprint on the windshield of a car? If you wanted your fake footprint to look as real as possible, you would put it on the ground, where feet usually are. Again, the footprint on the car windshield was a BF joke played on Sasquatch Ontario. In addition, in the audio of the footprint on the windshield, you can hear someone whispering, “Cast it.†Another joke. You cannot cast a snowy footprint on the windshield of the car. The BF know this. It was said (by them) in jest. These jokes have all been at Sasquatch Ontario’s expense. Why would Sasquatch Ontario deliberately mock himSELF to help him sell hoaxed material as authentic? He wouldn’t. No charlatan publicizes his skills as a charlatan to make the public think he’s honest. In my opinion, all these prints and sounds are exactly what SO says they are. They were made by the BF, and not by him.
    2 points
  3. If you hear a human speaking, you know it's human.The repeating evidence of phonetic ability pulls my cart in the direction of BF being a hominin if they are truly flesh and blood 24/7. The argument that you have to see it to know, doesn't really wash if one also claims to know when they hear known animals.
    1 point
  4. He sounds as if he is of the opinion they are interdimensional. If that was accurate, it would explain why any other opinion of what BF is , can't be proven. He describes circumstances of the drawings turning up and single tracks in snow, not connected to a trackway and doesn't offer how he thinks these things happen, but still thinks it's them.
    1 point
  5. SO should have stopped at his nature photography me thinks. He was quite better at that form of free-expression. I do like whatever is weaving his little gifts, though I don't buy the pen on paper artwork of Sasquatch nor the soundtracks of an articulatory Giant gifted with vivid expression and prosody who calls Mike by name and leaves perfect footprints in snow in the middle of open stretches between tiretracks within six inches next to one another.
    1 point
  6. Personally, handprints and footprints have never begun to get me extremely excited except for the ones that have a five to six foot distance between them. Those prints I pay attention to only because the legitimate ones have nothing in the mud or snow that points to hoaxing either from above or beside them. The other ones I pay attention to are when a person sees a hairy person standing next to their home, for instance, and then the next morning they might see prints. The others? It's an anomaly... The one above almost looks as if someone was drawing a handprint to make it look like a handprint. It might have been a child, except no evidence of children being there at the cottage when this was reported has ever been mentioned. The hairy people sometimes will play a joke and that is possible. But I agree because that is one strange print. They have drawn things on frosted cold windows at a friend's house. That could be a calling card, an invitation, etc. It is really strange when you find things that make you scratch your head and the decision to mention it or not takes precedence over what is the "real evidence" and so I think there are lots of things that go unreported in this case. People are not going to jeopardize their livelihoods by admitting such things are happening. Edited to add: I had no idea that LeafTalker was posting the post above mine lol...................Oi Vay.......... LT, I plussed your post. That was weird............
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...