Leaderboard

Bigfoot Ballyhoo, eh? Seems like a detective (among others) went and did some detecting: http://squatchdetective.weebly.com/hall-of-shame---bigfoot-ballyhoo--linda-newton-perry.html Putting forth "evidence" supplied by Linda Newton Perry is akin to endorsing the tales of Todd Standing or Rick Dyer, IMHO. It may or may not be true, but the source is so tainted that anything she says is suspect.

I truly believe some people are purposely placed on this forum, although I have no idea by who. They have to be, no one in their right mind would spend such time on a subject that they don't believe is real in the first place and repeat themselves over and over and over and over again saying it.

My apologies if I was terse. Do you not see risk in adding such a dubious "tale" to a discussion that is already on such shaky ground? Would you not agree that adding yet another completely uncorroborated (and probably apocryphal) tale on only detracts from the discussion of the tx incident? I feel that introducing such far fetched stories do exactly that and make it that much more difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. I concur that a robust discussion is key but certainly there must be some threshold to what can be considered additive. In any event, I apologize again for the tone of my posting.

So, The link takes one to a story posted in 2013. The disclaimer for the article is: SUNDAY, JUNE 23, 2013 Guest Editor-Blogger: Sophia (I can not prove that any of this is true. We are working at getting information that will prove the late Dr. Miller is who he claims to be. ...Linda Newton-Perry) There is some back and forth in the comments section positing possible matches for the "Dr. Miller". Nothing is ever confirmed that I read, there is no original letter. The second link I don't understand at all. So, If I might ask. What is the point? It's not as though there is a dearth of unconfirmed / unconfirmable stories in the public domain. The effort put into writing this up makes me think there was something important you were attempting to convey. All that is coming through for me is yet one more fantastical type story using an "argument from authority" in the personage of this "Dr. Miller". Shall we all comb the interwebs for apocryphal stories from dubious sources? I don't get this.

These are wolves; those are not. (We don't have wolf packs down here; we hear the same sounds.) https://www.google.com/search?q=audios+of+wolves+howling&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS570US570&oq=au&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i60j69i57j69i60.6854j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8