Leaderboard

Link to the paper: http://1drv.ms/1BnR9hm I am away from WiFi access until Saturday. I do hope you enjoy the research! Original thread. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/50970-what-about-the-bones/

Unlike the anonymous you that sits behind your computer I am a real researcher with a real reputation who personally knows and deals with other researchers face to face. You are right that I am afraid of people like you, because you and people like you want to destroy reputations. Anything to further your non existence belief system. You look at each destroyed reputation with glee because it furthers your agenda, rather than sadness that someone succumbed to human weakness and felt the need to hoax or fabricate. Your follow the money ruse is just a thinly veiled attempt to lump me in with money seeking hoaxers and hurt my reputation. You deftly dance around forum rules by using innuendo and false associations. Follow the money is an example of that. If you follow my money it is out of my pocket to fund my research. Something you would not understand.

Bet some big donors are talking to either lawyers trying to get their money back or the DA in Utah. There was a recent filing of charges in another Gofundme situation. Someone collected money to start some business and spent it all on everything but the business. So DA's across the country will be jumping on that bandwagon because the public does not like to be ripped off. Going after people who do that would be very good for reelection purposes. I don't think we have heard the last of the Falcon Project.

^SO and Dr J- both of which are trying to cash in on their gullible followers. Go figure, huh?

He can postpone the weather? Perhaps we've underestimated the guy.

That seems very likely! How about Meldrum and Idaho State U? Dr. Jeff has now been associated with a string a questionable characters. What does that say about his credibility? Dragging his university into the mix; what impact will that have? If a legit project attempts to get university backing in the future will this debacle make that more difficult?

There is nothing that he's shown that can be called "real" by any degree because nothing is verifiable.

That's a very weak argument. Disgruntled girlfriends have been known to cause much worse trouble than that for completely innocent guys.

Don't call them skeptics, they are not, they are scofftics/denialists. And the true believers do the same thing.

There you go.

I sometimes wonder if it would do this thread and discussion any good to actually present the full collection of recordings made over the years and show interested parties where and how to identify and understand what is significant in them. I often feel it would either end in a battle of wits before the first point gets across, particularly when the assertion made up front is that you can't know anything without seeing the vocalist, or it would go over too many peoples heads, or they wouldn't read the reference material, or they wouldn't comprehend it.

This thread now has me giggling hysterically...... Airstrikes, and ghillie suit dude armed with a stick, and it ain't even sharp. Too funny!