Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/22/2015 in all areas

  1. Tell me, show me - Why? You wouldn't believe it anyway. I am done responding to folks who have nothing better to do with their time then to waste ours.
    2 points
  2. I met Nathan and talked to him before the meeting. He was talking to another young man that picked up and moved to the PNW too. With young people like this in the hunt, BF will have trouble staying unknown to science. Thom Powells new book is available.
    1 point
  3. Humans and non-human animals have varying temperaments. If bigfoot fall into either of those categories, I'd imagine it's the same for them.
    1 point
  4. I so agree with this statement. I've been a believer ever since I was a kid and introduced to the subject of BIgfoot by In Search Of. I have never had an experience but I haven't put myself out there in places where one may occur. The past few years have killed much of my interest in the subject. Things like the rampant hoaxes, failed DNA projects, commerciliazed goofiness like Finding Bigfoot have all left a bad taste in my mouth. I want Sasquatch to be real in the worst way but the lack of real scientific evidence (body on a slab or DNA) over the last 40 years that I have been paying attention to the subject is truly disheartening.
    1 point
  5. Why is there such a divide and such hostility between two groups of people who are actively interested in the same subject? That seems silly to me...
    1 point
  6. I sort of agree with you about the blink thing anyway. BF is so good at not being seen in plain sight, perhaps it has learned that blinking is movement and that is a dead giveaway to humans. Perhaps they train to avoid blinking when they are concerned about being seen by a human? Without motion of any kind, most of the time our brains would assume what we are seeing is just a stump. It would take a photographic expert to examine Standings stuff or someone observing him doing it to hope to prove that it has been fabricated. Much of it certainly does not look authentic to me. The red flare thing was pure B grade Hollywood. We are supposed to believe that the flares were the only thing keeping the BF from attacking Standing. But he ran out of flares and still is around. How is that possible?
    1 point
  7. <What evidence 'Sasquatch'' was a ''household word'' in 1957? Even in Canada? No way> Did you do some research on that or just pull it out of your bu...rain.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...