Leaderboard

Reading comprehension includes what Gumshoeye wrote preceding the article- "Bigfoot Attacks"- and the intent behind it. I wasn't responding to the intent of the article, I was responding to Gumshoeye's intent of using the article. How is that not clear? Seriously? The fact that he knew months ago that these were Bundy victims, and yet still presents them as being "Bigfoot Attacks", makes me question his honesty again for the second time.

So what about his simple question about your meat statement

It's the same flawed logic. If it was already shown to be flawed then what makes you think it's suddenly going to be good in a different video? If you think the Independence Day footage is a golden ticket then take it to the scientists. Otherwise what are you complaining about? Do you just like repeating the same comments in caps to your opposition? So the other day we had Gumshoeye trying to push his cop experience and now you trying to push a Health license. Seems to be a trend- I have a hunting and fishing license, does that give me special Bigfoot powers? Gum gave us Ted Bundy/Bigfoot killer stories from his expertise. You're telling us boogers seem to have orange muscle meat. I guess we should have Bigfoot proven in no time. How about those nano-bio crystals you were holistically preaching about and how they really pertain to Bigfoot? Have any hard proof of those? Or is this just more pseudo hot air?

Is today Opposite Day and no one let me know?!? Why is everyone responsible to do their due diligence except the person who actually supplies the information? I'm not saying that there was an intent to deceive. I am saying that everyone who presents information should give their best effort to ensure its accuracy and relevance.

When people start referring to Bigfoot as a "proven wild animal" then I would agree to it being fascinating. You are so intent on wanting the reality of Bigfoot that you've literally convinced yourself that it is now proven. To claim that Bigfoot is proven and that science, scientists, and skeptics are all wrong seems almost like reaching the point of desperation. Is there a reason why Bigfoot can't just be a mystery? Or are believers now in need of absolutes like the hardline skeptics? Like I stated before I want Bigfoot to be real as much as the next guy, but I want real evidence that can't be written off as hoaxing or misidentification. Descriptions and reports have been out there and accessible to anyone, making them easy to mimic. This is not solid evidence of anything. The foot castings seem to come in every shape and size imaginable lacking any real consistency.