Leaderboard

Not really. That is the same thing he posts in every thread.

The following presumes you are not trying to "cash in" from the find. It would have to be done anonymously. This nullifies the character assassination episodes that are commonly used to discredit the find. Scientists don't need big pieces to administer DNA tests. 1) Establish proof of source by video of the subject and the act of extracting the samples. Good video, show the teeth, , sexual organs, eyes, nostrils, ears, pull on the hair to demonstrate its not a suit or wig, etc. Don't show your face or other identifying features of yourself. 2) Detach the head and a foot and secretly store it. 3) Extract small chunks and send them to many, many universities, labs, etc throughout the world, including the same documented video from #1 showing the act of extracting the samples. 4) Send more samples to many, many news organizations throughout the world along with video from #1. 5) Leave the rest in the field. 6) shut up, until the species is acknowledged. If its not recognized as a BF, keep your mouth shut

in the back of your truck. Doesn't matter whether you shot it, it had a heart attack, or a limb fell on it - you have one - and it's loaded up in your truck. What will you do next? There are indicators that the scientific community - even the Smithsonian - has been provided with skeletons and skulls of many giants - and yet none are on display, none are available for inspection, and they say they don't have any. The scientific community as an entity - seem to go to lengths to ignore the bulk of eyewitness sightings and even castings of footprints. They are invested in a narrative that grudgingly changes every decade or so, moving back when mankind first arrived in North and Central America as the evidence is absolutely forced down their throats. They have crafted a narrative, and that narrative does not allow for another species. I personally, do not trust some of the DNA testing done that's inconclusive or on occasion attributed to another species. Of course a large percentage of hair samples will be of other animals. But other things have been sent to scientific entities, including universities, and are never seen again. Some say the military is very much aware of these, and that too, is concealed. Others may ask to what end? Same thing the narrative of the Phillistines suggested - giants come in handy if YOU have some, and your opponent doesn't. So, if you let it be known you have one, both stated and federal authorities just may confiscate it. The Feds also have a form that they carry with them that orders you in the interest of National Security, you can never speak of whatever, you can never refer to it, and they ask the names of everyone you've contacted, and they impose the same threat on them - one more conversation - or referral - and you go to prison. So. What are your ideas, or what are your plans, to ensure your treasure doesn't just disappear?

Why because you don't like the way I think and look at things? Because I don't fit into your idea of how a PhD would look at things? Which is one big reason why no progress is ever made in regards to BF research. The only progress that will ever be made is if someone like Norse or fararcher brings in a body, or I continue in my research and shake up the scientific community enough to take an honest look at the subject.

Nice photo of a wolf kitakaze. Northern Cascades, where they have been for years. Earlier in this thread what was being talked about was the southern Cascades. GPNF to be exact. And no there are not any wolf packs there yet. Although individuals do pass through at times. If you compared BF behavior to some of Human behavior you would probably be closer to actually understanding what they can do rather than looking and comparing them to lesser animals. Please don't go into a technological discussion because I have seen no evidence that they use it or have it or even want it. Technology is not proof of intelligence. It is just the form in which our intelligence is exhibited.

I believe trap cams are the wrong technology to capture images of BF. I believe that the only "catches" one may expect is a daylight shot from the back, or a crossing blur at night, and maybe an occasional shot of the back at night. I believe the results to date support my belief.

If your degree is in wildlife biology, then you really should know better. Saying that not all coyotes avoid game cams applies as much to Bigfoot as to coyotes. Over seven years the Cascades Carnivore Project has documented every medium to large animal species living in the Cascades range. A stealthy medium-sized nocturnal mammal with a population of one, a wolverine, has been documented and genetically verified. And not one Bigfoot in seven years, right smack where they are supposed to be. The Bluff Creek Project has done the same thing yet they were specifically testing the hypothesis of whether or not Bigfoot exists in the area. They have reached the same conclusion - Bigfoot does not exist where it was supposed to have been, at least in 1967. This does not matter to the Bigfoot enthusiast. The belief system is built on the indoctrination of excuse making. There is nothing you can do in actually testing the claim of Bigfoot existing that will ever do anything to a devout Bigfoot believer.

Right. Given what a very clear film - all analysis of which has come back "probable unlisted primate" and for which skeptics have not found a scrap of evidence supporting anything else - says, and how people have responded to it... why would we presume that anybody getting a cam-trap shot of anything unusual would just go public with it? It is the very essence of fundamentalism to pretend that dissenting viewpoints either do not exist or are inherently invalid. Make-up artists Chris Walas and Rick baker have analyzed the film and concluded a hoax. Scientists like primatologist Dr. Bill Sellers have analyzed the film and concluded a hoax. "why would we presume that anybody getting a cam-trap shot of anything unusual would just go public with it?" The various scientists and program directors at the conservation groups conducting vast animal detection efforts smack in the middle of Bigfoot habitat that I have communicated with are very clear about why they would go public with good evidence of Bigfoot...

Post away, DWA. Get it out of your system. Post like the wind! Then spare us the constant drone of your uber predictable anti-scientist screeds.