Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/28/2016 in all areas

  1. ShadowBorn, You are right it can be denied. But this is science being done. I posted this in the bones thread. But for those that missed it and want to take the time to investigate further, I will post it here. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.olduvaiproject.org/wp-content/uploads/taphonomy-of-ungulate-ribs-and-the-consumption-of-meat-and-bone.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwiQreWJ7pnLAhVCy2MKHY-dB5IQFggbMAA&usg=AFQjCNHx0uCSAzb9jA_d483xCqb7O6eE4w&sig2=inqnZ5ZYx6F_ZtljoZbUIw Yes it can be denied. Anything can be. But if you're interested science is happening. My point is we are finding comparisons with hominid feeding behavior. Comparing it with science that has been done. You want to dig deeper look at some of their reference materials. If we can get some of those same researchers interested in what we are doing it could give a kickstart to getting mainstream science involved. Backdoor so to speak. The biggest problem with DNA right now is, even if it isn't human, full scale correct testing needs to be done on every sample of supposed bigfoot DNA. Somebody have deep pockets here? As soon as it gets even close to human the goto is contamination. So what is anyone's suggestion on how to get around that? I do have one idea that just might work. If you are absolutely sure it is a bigfoot sample. Turn it in as yours for a genome project. I wonder what would happen when they began seeing some odd markers?
    1 point
  2. http://www.forbiddenarcheology.com/
    1 point
  3. It can be classified, but I doubt in an official manner. Plus it wouldn't be a proper name of their kind to just call them bigfoot, it will be hard to erase that term. If they can mate with modern sapiens with fertile offspring then they would be human with human rights and also subject to our laws governing us. It would not work out for them. That's a major road block. FWIW, I've been on the genus homo coarse from day one on this forum and going on 9 years ago. far before Ketchum came along. The evidence has always spoke the same things to me, "human" but different enough to not fit in our society. It may be that the differences can be found in the nuclear DNA and that would classify it as technically another species, but there would be a political correctness problem in doing so should it be proven they have modern sapiens mitochondria. I want to know what they are for sure, and it can be done with DNA, but most likely only on a personal level, due to all the second guessing that goes on about provenance of samples. It takes multiple independent results from a sample that tests human and which you know should not be, to accept they are human without seeing the creature. I know my sample should not be from an ordinary modern human based on all observations at the time of collection, the morphology etc. Yet it has tested human once. This is why I wanted it tested again and again. Based on other testing of samples outside Ketchum's study, it's clear that no nonhuman ape DNA has ever come from the samples, so I'm not expecting that to change. The descriptor of " wild human" is dominant when experts and witnesses relate their experiences and impressions of the evidence. The collective of that is not likely wrong in my opinion. If I add the tracks and morphology there, plus the audio recordings from people I think are legit and which contain the speech sounds, my hypothesis gets even stronger, while yours requires you to try and shout all the evidence down leaving you with little to none, for a creature that is so well dispersed across the country and should be much easier to find without human intelligence.
    1 point
  4. Retired from a technical career at 53 due to health challenges, now a month away from 65 and able to explore my wide ranging interests. My wife and best friend just put in 60 days notice to her board this morning and when we have our 39th anniversary in July we'll be embarked on a new chapter of our journey to forever together. Part of that will include exploring the many parts of Montana we've missed as well as points west. With luck, we may even meet some of the fine folks from the forum!
    1 point
  5. Hey zman1967.......doing well and thank you. Yeah, I should start posting again, got about 2 months worth of some crazy stuff to post:)
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...