Leaderboard

We can't have any Neanderthal genes in us without successful reproduction. We are all hybrids with different immunities. There is no fork in the above statements.

These are some of the upheavals in Europe that were going on around 40,000 years ago. In other words, during the last 10-15,000 years of Neanderthal. Check the large long-term cosmic ray superwave bombardment noted in the ice cores with the discovery of the proxy isotopes of beryllium 10, NO3, and other signatures. DNA could have mutated then? Brain power could have been enhanced? Neanderthal could have died off after generations of cancers. It's an interesting study believe me, Ran across it about 5 years ago.

Regardless of the expertise or sobriety of the observer, all are subject to misinterpretation of what they are seeing. Although one can have some outdoor expertise in hunting or camping (observation of nature in this case) they are still subject to misidentification of a subject. One can narrow down the experience to what ever category one chooses, but in the end, when all are tossed in to the same pot, an average emerges. A city slicker can have a legit sighting and a seasoned hunter can have a mis-ID of a creature, it is all up to the specific circumstances of the encounter. As I mentioned to WSA, I'm resisting the urge to over think this question. When one starts putting parameters on the conditions of a sighting, to many if's and but's get tossed in and it just muddy's the issue. One could take it to the extreme I suppose and ask how many hunters have had a misidentification of a Sasquatch on a Tuesday at noon during the vernal equinox on a leap year, but I was thinking more in general terms. Point being, there are thousands, if not tens or hundreds of thousands, of sightings of Sasquatch. I find it amazing for anyone to say that ALL are either misidentified or hoaxes with any level of certainty.

How does this image compare?? https://sasquatchchronicles.com/this-is-what-patty-would-look-like-up-close/ This is how I imagine a bigfoot would look close up..........

Well, because when you read a lot of them in order to mine data from them, you painfully realize how weak most reports are. I invite all to classify just 20 reports. That is, read them thoroughly, mine the data and input it into the SSR. You'll soon realize how weak the evidence is in most sighting reports. BTW, this will also allow you to appreciate the 2% of reports that really stand out as legitimate.

I think there are probably more BFs misidentified as bears, rottweilers, cows, or stumps, than animals misidentified as BFs.