Leaderboard

I don't consider you a true scientist or qualified to declare what is and is not true science. Anyone got a mirror?

I don't consider you a true scientist or qualified to declare what is and is not true science. Anyone got a mirror? And what else can be expected from a bigfoot proponent such as yourself? Since you are at odds with my science and the science I adhere to can we please see what your brand of science has brought to the table that rivals that of real science. Dude, that's not surprising since you seem to make up your own rules as you go along.

WesT Are you talking about this article: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22730383-700-new-species-extinct-human-found-in-cave-may-rewrite-history/ I find it very strange that these new found Humans would be found in a cave. They were not placed there and they were not found anywhere else, so what event took place that us humans had to take shelter in caves? If it was more then one person who placed these Humans in these caves who are obviously dead then where are the people that did so? so some event took placed where we had to go from living in the open to living in caves. I have been in caves in Mexico and they are not pretty, nor are they healthy. These people were found way back in the cave where there is no light, so did some thing happen where the earth was scorched for a long period of time.

Crow, that's a load of manure - you sure do make a lot of assumptions and give contrived attributes to "Bigfooters." I don't think skeptics are lacking in awe and imagination - I myself never gave these things a moment's consideration, and since I thought I'd been almost everywhere, and seen almost everything - I was a lot like you. I don't have a cause. And I wasn't searching for Bigfoot, since they were not even in my universe. Didn't know anything about them, and didn't care. Nor did I care that I didn't care. I don't care anything about proving diddly-squat to science. I go again, I won't be returning without one. I guarantee I won't be going for science. They already have zero interest at all in re-writing their anthropology, biology, and archaeological texts. I was ignorant. Now I'm not.

Just for clarity here on the infrasound stuff, I think people use the word and have in the past wrongly and in a similar way to how they use others words out of context and in a way that they shouldn't. 67mopar is right, Primates don't use Infrasound, but they do use Ultrasound and Ultrasound, just like Infrasound, does have similar effects to adult humans such as dizziness, nausea and can cause death. I'm saying this as 67mopar ignored my original post about that and continued to pull people who are using the word infrasound which IMO is being used when it shouldn't be. The truth is clearly, many people don't understand infrasound, myself included, and I believe are looking for a word to describe certain experiences and have adopted "infrasound" when they shouldn't have done. Ultrasound looks to be a much more possible answer to what these experiences could be down to, because ultrasound has and continues to get documented within Primates and it causes the exact same symptoms as infrasound does.