Leaderboard

Crow, Thats untrue. Boiled down to brass tacks when skeptics CANNOT find the zipper, then they fall back on the "well its 2016 and science would have found one by now if real" argument. Which is just a smug baseless accusation that plays it safe. As far as I know there is no official scientific project blue book study going on concerning Sasquatch sightings and evidence. But there are scientists and experts looking at tracks and film. Of course the skeptics throw out any positive testimony of the evidence. So NO not all Bigfoot evidence has been proven to be a hoax. YOU may be convinced its all a hoax.....but thats just your opinion. Of course we need physical remains to prove its existence, but there is evidence that supports the notion something is out there. People with PHD's out looking support this assertion......sorry.

The debate has wandered, and Im referencing your post 360. In which it seems like your saying all evidence has been proven to be a hoax. And evidence is never going to get you to the "real" category. Otherwise we would call it proof from the get go. As far as habbers, I like you have a hard time believing people have habituated Bigfoot Jane Goodall style and unlike Jane offers no scientific data about the species......IF true? What a waste.....but I doubt it is. But what your trying to do is use habbers to discredit the larger subject. The same way your using hoaxers to discredit the subject, and you seem to superimpose them at will to support your talking points. Which is why I brought up the shark fin analogy. I think to be fair, Ray Wallace and the Fox habber lady, are pretty easy targets. There is evidence out there that is much tougher and more resilient. And not just the PGF. But Im not here to sway public opinion about the existence of Bigfoot. Im here only for the truth and to promote procurring a type specimen if the species is indeed real.