Leaderboard

I would be very fearful of trying to drug one of these things for a number of reasons. 1. Dosage is mass dependent and type dependent. Not going to be a very accurate calculation. 2. Whatever you use, it can't be the same stuff used on other animals that in turn you must track long distances before it drops - these critters can cover some country fast. 3. This thing is not a dumb animal. I say it's 50/50 that you aren't immediately attacked by the one you hit with the tranquilizer - with ill intent. 4. I'm contrary to many here, as I'm saying that these things are usually NOT alone. You drug one, the other(s) may pull your head off or slam you up against a tree and crush you. And THEN pull you apart. 5. If you had some "habitat," after one gets tranquilized, you'll never see them on friendly terms ever again.

Crow, Thats untrue. Boiled down to brass tacks when skeptics CANNOT find the zipper, then they fall back on the "well its 2016 and science would have found one by now if real" argument. Which is just a smug baseless accusation that plays it safe. As far as I know there is no official scientific project blue book study going on concerning Sasquatch sightings and evidence. But there are scientists and experts looking at tracks and film. Of course the skeptics throw out any positive testimony of the evidence. So NO not all Bigfoot evidence has been proven to be a hoax. YOU may be convinced its all a hoax.....but thats just your opinion. Of course we need physical remains to prove its existence, but there is evidence that supports the notion something is out there. People with PHD's out looking support this assertion......sorry.