Leaderboard

There is no point. Just the participation blows my mind. There must be more to life surely if that's how your head works. I just don't understand why anyone would do it, in my book it's just persistent "legalised" trolling.

I crudely applied the ME section to a previously plotted sighting map I made up for the state. Interesting, but not surprisingly, the majority of sightings are outside the corridors. No people, no sightings. Thanks for the info BobbyO

The timelines provided (which I agree with) do not depict any homo existent during Pangea. Do you realize there were dinosaur species roaming Pangea, some 200 million years ago? Your posted timelines show homo (edit: ancestors of homo) at 7 million years ago.

*slaps forehead* Crow you would be doing skeptics a favor if you just left the debating up to others of your party. With your ramblings anyone following this thread that was riding the fence? Is now a proponent.....congratulations.

You have found nothing, Crow. You ASSERT that there is no such thing as bigfoot. No matter how you try to hide it, Crow "logic" boils down to the notion that lack of evidence is evidence of lack. Everything you say eventually comes back to that and we know that in propositional logic that is a false statement. All you have is your dogma. Throw up smoke screens, obfuscate all you wish, it still all comes back to the same old false statement. MIB

Film Patty for 59.5 seconds. Slap in a new film reel and film a trackway- NOT more Patty. What is so danged hard about this? Nothing. But what do I get? Oh, there is a "hypothetical" 10 more out takes. Oh, can't risk a close up. Oh, the extra footage was edited out. Seriously? Had to go back on horseback for plaster. I say a hoaxer good enough to pull this whole thing off as a hoax would've had the plaster with them. What do I get? Oh, they didn't have it because it would tire the horses. Is there anyone out there that I could discuss these things with that can do any better than this? Because if there isn't then I'm walking away from this thread. The rebuttals so far are grabbing straws out of thin air simply for the sake of having SOMETHING- ANYTHING- no matter what it is- as long as it's a counter statement. For NO OTHER REASON than to have a counter statement. No links, no backup facts, just lashing out with anything one can. Crowlogic this has to be the weakest debate I've ever heard come out of you. Honestly. It is. Anyone else out there?....