Leaderboard

Am I the only one who finds it passing weird there are those who still think proof of Bigfoot is going to be visited on them on an internet discussion board? Obviously, there are those who still didn't get that memo. I sort of look at the board as a funnel for information on a topic I'm interested in....cuts down on the calories otherwise required to find it, which is nice, but I don't confuse it with a source that has the ability to profoundly realign my views on mankind's position in the natural world. When you say any such random like this young man's is not convincing you? You only emphasize to me how truly deficient your fact finding skills really are. If you think proof OR refutation of BF is going to arrive enclosed in the BFF equivalent of a certified letter, I'd just be of the opinion you are misinformed. And lazy.

You are right. In your mind P/G film, not a bigfoot, Brown video, not a bigfoot, Idaho falls video, not a bigfoot. My footprint pictures, not a bigfoot. Anyone else's pictures, not a bigfoot. I doubt that the Utah guy could ever come up with anything convincing on a FLIR. Not sure I could either for that matter. I dare say you would not believe in bigfoot until it chases you down and starts to eat you. You notice that there is a BFRO expedition in Western New York? Your chance to go and explain to them how they are all crazy and convert them to your cause. Bigfoot is never going to chase anyone anywhere. I dare you to stand and deliver your "proof". Daring me to do anything is pretty humorous, when I have been within yards of a bigfoot solo. Nothing I do other than delivering a bigfoot body to your doorstep will be your proof. Quite frankly I could really care if you ever know the truth when if you harbor the slightest possibility they might exist, you could get your tail out in the woods of New York and find out for yourself. That BFRO expedition might be a way to do that. If nothing else you can have fun with the fools that actually believe in bigfoot and enjoy some nature at the same time. I assume you believe that nature exists. I dare you to do at least that. You are not going to find out anything sitting in front of your computer.

Weird ... and pathologically entitled. Folks seem to think they're owed entertainment. Wrong. If a person wants to see evidence, they either have to go to the field and find it themselves or wait 'til whoever does find it is good and well ready to share. This thing you see going on here ... it's victim mentality. MIB

Actually you made my point without knowing it. If coal is dated 359 to 299 million years ago because it is coal and in the Carboniferous but it is found that coal can be formed more recently because of carbon 14 dating and decay then all of strata dating is wrong, including dating of human fossils. Objects completely embedded or encased in a lump or formation of coal have to have been formed when the coal was. Stratification dating is based on known or presumed dates of layers and you walk further or more recently in time going up or down in the strata based on some known or presumed to be known date of a layer. If strata markers used to determine significant layers are wrong based on wrong assumptions, the whole system is wrong. But science comes along and continues to use the same yardsticks for time measurement based on something that is only assumed in the first place. Reminds me of when I was a fireman. Every before noon every day the fire department dispatcher would check the phone company 911 dispatcher time to make sure their clock was correct then blow the siren precisely at noon. One day someone called the fire department and said that the whistle was blown 5 minute after noon on their wrist watch and wondered what was going on. The dispatcher checked his clock with the phone company time and they matched so he did not understand why it would have been late. Then he called the phone company and asked them what they used to make sure their time was correct. They replied that they checked their phone time with the fire station siren every noon. Each one was using the other to set their time and it gradually drifted off the real time. Is that what is going on with stratification dating?

Thanks Cryptic, I do my part of the research by making comparisons. I've learned enough over the last couple years that I can get a reasonable idea of which larger predator/scavengers fed on an animal. As far as dentition goes, the only thing that compares to a very reasonable extent with what we have found is hominid dentition. Yes for all of those that have a problem with the idea, comparisons can be made. One of our main references does just that with archeological sites. They also use ungulate ribs in their determination. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030544031200427X In my original analysis I arrived at unknown predator. Here on the Bigfoot Forums I share what is the best fit. I guess I could say it was giant wild humans if that is more palatable to some. But why? When there is already large amounts of evidence pointing to bigfoot. Why make up something else just because the answer may be unacceptable to some. We look at it this way... It's a backdoor way to get mainstream science interested in the subject. Until that body comes in we will continue to work on it. Something else I have been considering. I will make this offer. If anyone is interested and going to be in the Kelso, WA area, drop me a PM. I can share some of our findings and the work I've been doing. Maybe if time allows go up to one of the kill sites.

I was never taken by the Chehalis sounds. They simply weren't hominin in origin. They really don't compare to others, where there is no question whether it's hominin, only whether it's a modern human or "other" hominin. The sounds are important if we are ever going to know when we hear one, and the truth will rise above all the mis-identifications because it doesn't change.

Lack of early human fossils in North America is not the problem. The problem is that some have been found here but they are too early to be believed. DWA's "anomalous remains" are things like human remains encased in Carboniferous coal hundreds of feet underground in a coal mine in Ohio. Rather than figure out how that could happen science just ignores things it cannot begin to explain. I have often said North American history is completely wrong. But if some of these anachronisms are real, human history is wrong too. Bigfoot or ancient human skeletons or fossils are out there to find in North America if they have not been found already.