Leaderboard

Maybe it is H, maybe it is, but i'm adamant that there is a population of them a little further north just as there might be in the GPNF area where you are talking of in general. I don't think we are taking of a mass migration of hundreds of animals all across the South Cascades Geographical Zone. I think we're talking about little groups moving for whatever reason towards or from the Olympic Peninsula and the numbers seem to suggest that this happens, a little further north than what you're saying, in the Spring time. This may coincide with the lack of South Cascade Geographical Zone reports in the Winter and sees animals returning to there from the Olympic Peninsula in Spring, or it might see animals going to the Olympic Peninsula for what could be mating purposes. Small populations of any animal would have to travel fair size distances to find mates and as per what some locals in that general area have gone on record in saying, their belief due to certain factors including extreme vocalizations that don't happen at any other time of year, is that Sasquatches do mate in the general area south of the Capitol State Forest. Of course what i've written may be well wide of the mark and we're nowhere near on the right track, but i will always side with what the numbers are telling us and will always attempt to look to breaking them down and finding genuine, logical reasoning for them. where possible

jayjeti, You use the word "definitely" where I likely would not. I suspect our differences regarding what constitutes scientific evidence and proof would differ as well. Not having seen a Sasquatch personally, I can only evaluate the material online from the perspective it provides. So far, I've seen nothing that rejects the null hypothesis that there is no zoological Sasquatch. Indeed, despite its many promoters and believers, Sasquatch is not recognized by "science" for precisely the same reason - a lack of good evidence. I remain open to the possibility however and find it an interesting thing to think about. But folks like Utah Sasquatch and Impossible Visits etc. seem to not have the same level of discernment and skepticism I do. Having watched all of the videos posted, I saw nothing that would convince me and much of it seemed foolhardy to be frank. I won't say it's a hoax, just that I disagree with the conclusions reached by these videos. I also disagree with several of the anti-science/anti-evidence promoted by these folks. I think they do the entire community a disservice and of course this doesn't help with science literacy in this country. I do think the NAWAC is doing a much better job. While they have no come up with anything solid yet, they are at least aware of the fact that nobody ELSE should conclude Sasquatches exist based on the evidence they've collected this far. They agree to the basic ground rules of science and are not at all surprised that other people require them to provide DNA or a type specimen. That counts for a lot in my book because without and agreement on what actually comprises the scientific method, we get nowhere. It's a good system and it's moved humanity from the horse and buggy to CERN discovering the Higgs in well under 100 years. Proving that Sasquatches exist is not an impossible task - if there really is such a creature.

Frauds come and go and this is no doubt one of them. The thing that's interesting to me is that grown, supposedly educated people will believe it and even go as far as sending a smooth talking clown like this money. It's unbelievable but not surprising I suppose. Folks believe in and are ripped off by scams, cults and preachers every day and always will be. t.

Crow . What does the Manhattan project and the Germans have to do with the title of this thread other than you are doing your usual trolling and arguing about everything, even the off topic stuff?.