Leaderboard

Okay Cryptic. Now that I posted the link you can watch the interview. Reeves being there does pertain because he was witness to the setting and the circumstances behind the filming. The backstory is as important as what was filmed, because it helps eliminate the guess work that is going on.

I didn't post this for Thinker Thunker's review. Regardless of what you think of him. I posted for the insight from Mr Reeve who was there. I'm sorry some might not like the format of the interview, I think it's good because the interviewer wasn't constantly interrupting and changing track. Since he covers the issues and "theories" of most of the armchair critics, I find it funny that these things are still being parroted back here. This wasn't about Thinker Thunker or his critique of the movie, it was about listening to a person that was there and his take on the matter. CM, he discusses the fauna in the area. Since being there he is more qualified to talk of it than you are. Cattown, he also mentions the four wheeler (moped) idea that he found funny, as do I. (Make that hilarious!) It's been awhile since I have watched any critiques of this film. But, I found it interesting that Mr Reeves pointed out two other individuals that were in the area. Only as far as proof goes. If and when bigfoot is proven to exist; it has the same value as a documentary about caribou and other animals in this area does. It addresses range, habitat, behavior in front of a stampede. I will offer here that they may have been simply foraging in the area and were interrupted by the caribou. If someone is interested in doing a good critique of this by not using bad YouTube footage; a Blu-ray of the Imax film is available here for about $12. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/dvd-great-north-martin-j-dignard/5900563/2673945737201?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Marketplace+Shopping+Media_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP6857&k_clickid=3x6857

Right. This was not shot by a 13 yr old in his backyard in New Jersey. This is a Nat Geo style documentary shot for Imax about the north American artic. This is the stuff skeptics ask for. Of course me being cynical of film Im not holding my breath. But I think its safe to say we can rule out hoax or photoshop. I also think its safe to say we can rule out natural knowns such as Bear, etc. If its Bear Grylls? How did he get there?

Thats romantic and all.....but mother nature is a worse task master than modern society. If you fail in modern society you live in your parents basement eating ramen. If you fail in nature? Your dead. One wrong move, one calorie less than needed, one slip and its all over. And that goes for man, elk, bear or sasquatch.

BTW - You're correct, you've seen the nature of the community as a whole. Unfortunately. Thanks for posting this. The motion / figure Mr Reeve describes and the closeup remind me a lot of the Memorial Day footage which, scoftic opinion not withstanding, I'm inclined to accept at least 'til much stronger evidence against it than I've ever seen is presented. There seems little room for openmindedness and honest inquiry. If you're not a scoftic JREFer you have to be a kool aid swilling woo-****. Too many disallow the very science they claim to demand: Rather than look to the evidence to see what it says they try to dictate what that evidence is allowed to say. None the less, you are doing good work. Keep it up. MIB

Its not a part of the film crew, its not a Bear. Its not hunting Caribou with a rifle...... Its an all black Hominoid hundreds of miles into the wilderness hunting Caribou with its bare hands. Its Bear Grylls.

If even Matt Moneymaker doesn't think it's a Squatch, it isn't a Squatch.

Not proof yes. It does poke holes in skeptical claims that we have no good footage of Bigfoot. And having the cameraman vet the film adds to the credibility of the film.

You surprised me today, I would have put odds you would have said "Spend it on a few rounds of 45-70 and solve the mystery for yourself!" Did you at least think about saying that

The Kilchis Forest road is on the other side of the river from the County Park. That allows access considerably further in. That however is the narrow road that had all the logging trucks. Twice I had to frantically drive off the road to avoid head ons with logging trucks. Sunday when the loggers normally do not work would be a good day to go in there. An active logging area probably is not the best location to go looking for BF. Too much human activity during the day time. Back in Washington. Went into the field yesterday to check out an area that has a lot of salmon berry bushes. I had been in there during the winter and was fairly easy going then. Yesterday it was impossible. Thick brush 4 and 5 feet tall. I bushwhacked for a while then gave up and came out and just went down to the river where I could get down to it looking for footprints. Basically a big bust for the day. The forest road going in there in the GPNF is getting nearly impassible. Potholes are getting 2 feet deep. I have a high sitting 4 wheel drive off road truck and had concerns at times that I would high center. It is getting so bad that I can make better time parking and riding my fat tired bike over roads like that. One area of interest East of Mt St Helens still has the access road closed. Apparently the road washed out last winter. I wonder if I could get around the washout with my bike. Designation of Wilderness areas is no longer necessary. All the forest service has to do it not maintain the roads and make them impassible. They have all these rules about what sort of vehicles are legal on forest roads but when the roads fall into enough disrepair that the Forest Service can no longer patrol them, who is going to enforce their rules? I am getting to the point I really don't care what their rules are when they don't maintain the roads. Block them all off and I can go where I want with impunity because they cannot get in there either.

Weird ... and pathologically entitled. Folks seem to think they're owed entertainment. Wrong. If a person wants to see evidence, they either have to go to the field and find it themselves or wait 'til whoever does find it is good and well ready to share. This thing you see going on here ... it's victim mentality. MIB

Crow . What does the Manhattan project and the Germans have to do with the title of this thread other than you are doing your usual trolling and arguing about everything, even the off topic stuff?.