Leaderboard

Unlikely wild grasp at straws. It requires ignoring most of what the filmmaker, who was there, said, and replacing it with stuff of your own, who were not, to suggest such a thing. That's a swing and a miss. Try again ... ? Edit ... I think I need to add something. Why are you trying so hard to discredit this filmmaker yet in other threads trying to push your own incredible events? Have you stopped to consider your motives? MIB

Crow, So we who weren't there, can judge the reported remoteness of the area over someone who was... Okay.

Yeah really. I see you're keeping the bar set a bit on the low side. But the fake gorilla in that cage owed more to Patty than it does to the photo I posted. I have no doubt as to why that is either. I have no "bar". No video is going to blow this open, Ive said it a million times. But that prank video proves a point. The point is that a photo or video's "authenticity" is based on the viewers perception....nothing more. People thought they were in a real Gorilla cage, and when the Gorilla showed up? They never questioned it. Many had a visceral response of horror when touched by the costume. The skeptical community will not accept Bigfoot based on a Nat Geo photo. Because the creature doesnt exist in their mind. Period. No matter how "good" the photo they will look for the zipper. So therefore your "opinion" is about as worthless as a true believers in which every photo or video is a Sasquatch even if it requires red circles.

Sad news to hear; like others, I stand in amazement at his foresight in cataloging information about encounters from a variety of sources. RIP.

I find that hard to believe as seemingly every other single post you do, and you do it well enough on your own too.

Looks like a cameraman who knew he was in danger of being caught on film.

Exactly what details of the subject in a photo that clear would make you say " real bigfoot" or "can't be hoaxed" when you have no reference for what a real bigfoot looks like?

^^^^^ I doubt it. Never underestimate the Crow's power to ignore reality. MIB

Crow is back and "demanding" better pictures from someone like BTW that actually does field work? Be careful what you ask for Crow. BTW is one person that might get something you cannot explain away.

Yes it was, and I think someone claimed to have contacted somebody who was with the film company, and they said it was probably a film crew member, but I don't recall any names. Now we have the Man who was in charge of the filming telling us it was not a crew member, and that he himself thinks it is probably a bigfoot and or he thinks it makes more sense that it was, instead of a crew member.

Im sure it was. What makes this thread different is the camera man was just made aware of his films presence in the Bigfoot world. He was unaware of the anomaly in his film. So with this interview we now have his insight into what it was or wasnt.

Looks like it's dragging a small animal then throws it over it's shoulder with it's right hand.

How on earth did I not hear about this till now, I am happy to have known of the man if not known the man, certainly the father of all modern researchers. His pros were stellar, his ability to analyze and determine probability, his mathematical precision in deduction. I will miss hearing him speak of the sasquatch, his matter of fact approach. I dare say he never saw a sasquatch, but one does not have to see necessarily to know with certainty. He spoke with that level of certainty. You will be missed by all John Green, rest in peace.