Leaderboard

That's quite correct. It is NOT a guy on a mountain bike driving the herd. Mr. Reeves said very clearly that two helicopters were employed to help guide the herd in the right direction for the camera. You're not doing your homework, and you're making assumptions that are not only ridiculous in face of the facts, but malicious, calling (wrongly) someone you don't even know a liar. Nice job.

You have that right. We are constantly told that photographs are not evidence for the existence of BF. I agree with that assessment. Crows game is to needle me enough to post it then Crow will pick from the following list. 1: If it is too good, it is an obvious hoax. 2: If it is not good enough it will be declared a squatch blob and lump it in with all the rest. 3: It is not a BF but something else. 4: It is just a child dressed in a costume. 5: It is my pet ape. Options two and three will ignore the events leading up to me taking the photograph. Finally because I have provided pictures of footprints and published them on the forum, Crow has already declared me to have fabricated them because since BF does not exist in Crows mind, footprints have to have been fabricated. Crow has tap danced out of being reported for calling me a hoaxer by stating that Crow was not talking about me but footprint finders in general. If I had not been there to take the photograph and the photograph was the only evidence I could provide, as a casual observer I would probably pick option 3 and wonder where in South America or Africa the picture of the small ape was taken. So even though I have a picture, I have no way, other than my word, to prove where it was taken. So a picture of BF, not matter how good, has many arguments that can be made so as to render it not significant. It certainly is not proof of anything other than I know how to post pictures to the forum. I will offer, if any of you run into me at a conference, ask to see the picture. Somehow I don't think I will run into Crow at a BF conference. I have an 8 X 10 glossy that makes full use of the native resolution of the camera. An image on a computer does not do it justice anyway.

Professional film crew is not a sure thing. There is an equally poor video of a supposed bigfoot crossing a road at night and the video was made by a professional film crew. Junk is junk no matter who filmed it. Certainly it's no 'sure thing' but we should be dealing in terms of likelihood rather than absolutes, and in this case the likelihood of a hoax to me is very small. Could a camera man have been caught in the film inadvertantly? Possible but also unlikely as the witness recalls contrary and would have to be lying which also seems unlikely to me in this instance. Could it be another, as yet undetected human? This is possible, and that is why clearer, nearer footage could have made a big difference unfortunately.

I've been close enough to a wood knock to have heard the falling branch crash to the ground, and it didn't happen. It doesn't explain some of the knocks.

The facts as reported by the person who shot the footage in question. You're welcome!

some big woodpeckers that slam wood on wood, I have heard some louder piliated knocking, but even that is nothing to compare to my experience of thses guys

Right. This was not shot by a 13 yr old in his backyard in New Jersey. This is a Nat Geo style documentary shot for Imax about the north American artic. This is the stuff skeptics ask for. Of course me being cynical of film Im not holding my breath. But I think its safe to say we can rule out hoax or photoshop. I also think its safe to say we can rule out natural knowns such as Bear, etc. If its Bear Grylls? How did he get there?

Its not a part of the film crew, its not a Bear. Its not hunting Caribou with a rifle...... Its an all black Hominoid hundreds of miles into the wilderness hunting Caribou with its bare hands. Its Bear Grylls.

If even Matt Moneymaker doesn't think it's a Squatch, it isn't a Squatch.

He was my mentor. He was one of my best friends. I will miss him. Thomas Steenburg

That show was terrible, it was all about ratings and Matt Moneymaker wanting cameras pointing at him the whole time. How about we get more shows on TV where people actually investigate with science. Has anyone seen the couple of episodes MonsterQuest dedicated to bigfoot? I'd watch a whole series done like that!