DWA wrote:
That is actually wrong. Tracks have long been considered forensic evidence. For only one example (there are, of course, legion), the return of the okapi to Virunga National Park was announced as scientifically confirmed when okapi tracks, with no feet in them, were found.
A body don't get more physical than that.
=====================================
Its not wrong.
Confirming by tracks that a scientifically catalogued species has returned to its native range is NOT the same thing!!!!!
Science has the foot that made the track way!! The physical specimen is the KEY!
No Okapi physical specimen? No Okapi trackway....no Okapi species.....no Okapi study......... and no Okapi game preserve.
Its a skinny lost Kudu looking for water.....or a Hoax. Natives looking for tourism dollars with carved wooden hooves.
Your kidding me right!? LOOK AROUND......You have been drinking the Bindernagel kool aid for so long? Your no longer grounded in reality. Some how your confused to think we proponents have the upper hand....it's a joke.
Listen closely.....we will be laughing stock along with Bigfoot track casts until we have the physical FOOT that made them.
If we have that!? Nobody is laughing anymore.