Leaderboard

Hi Waggles and welcome to the Forum. As far as being welcome with open arms for killing a Sasquatch? No that's not what I've been thinking at all. In fact the opposite may be true. There will be no ticker tape parade for the one who brings one in by force. That's why my stress is on finding one that is already dead. As far as trying to pull the trigger on a live one? The issue there, and it's a serious one, broaches the subject of one's certainty that what they are taking aim at is NOT a guy in a suit! At what point does that determination occur to the degree that a hunter would actually pull the trigger? How close does the creature have to be? At twenty yards would there even be enough time to get one shot off? At a hundred yards with a scope can one honestly say it's not a Human in a suit? There's a lot more to say on this as the philosophical, psychological, social, and ethitcal issues are REAL. So much more so than shooting say, a bear, or an Elk. Find a dead one? Fine. Otherwise? It is at least an hugely serious social and moral issue.

On that note in this thread, the human dna was most consistent. It has always been that way with the physical evidence. I simply don't buy the idea they all were contaminated. Bigfoot might well be too related and yet too wild for official recognition. That fits the definition of a monster which we'd rather not exist.

Hummm... if there are families of BF stealing entire fruit crops, wouldn't it be reasonably easy to track them? let me guess, the witnesses are not interested in providing evidence that BF exists, they don't want to ruin their relationship with the animals, so we shouldn't even ask for evidence because they won't help no matter what. They just want to pass along the experience so we all know that they are "knowers". And of course, Branco will respect their wishes and won't reveal the location or any data that would allow confirmation. He just wants us to know that he is connected to knowers and that he is a knower himself. Next!