Leaderboard

I read Ron Morehead’s book titled Voices in the Wilderness (2013) and found it very helpful to better understand the background of the location and the people involved in the 1971-1974 events/recordings. The book also gave an update of further visits to the location by the author in the 90’s and 2008-2011. Most of the book was a historical recount of what transpired in and around that high Sierra Nevada hunting camp with only 3 chapters (out of 21) in the end being speculative and disconnected to the main story. I don’t understand why Ron is a recent proponent of the quantum creature idea (see link below from 2014), given that his book does not provide many anomalous examples that will push one in that direction. http://ronmorehead.com/quantum-bigfoot-theory/ I recall only two occasions in the book whereas Ron and his friends ran into weird unexplained events: One time Ron and Warren Johnson were walking towards a tree after hearing chattering sounds coming from that direction (they thought a BF was hiding behind the tree). They were paralyzed and could not move forward and had to retreat – p.29. Ron Morehead, Bill McDowell and Louis Johnson heard some weird clicking sounds outside their shelter. This clicking sound then entered the shelter but it had no source that could be seen. Ron and Bill heard the same clicking sounds at their private ranches/homes a week later. Still not knowing what caused those sounds. – p.30- 31 These 2 examples are not too compelling to push one towards a high strangeness quantum creature. Granted, I have not read Alan Berry’s book yet (Bigfoot – 1976) that go into more anomalous events that took place at the Sierra camp. But, it makes you wonder if other anomalous events were not included in the Voices in the Wilderness book because they were deemed too controversial. Maybe Ron’s belief in the quantum creature is based on evidence from others and not based on his experiences?

I don't know, I just like sending bigfoot poo to random people.

Nah, we all know the government would never cover up anything! LOL! As for taking a specimen, that's not for the faint of heart, nor the foolish. Of course, the same could be said of anyone that's willing to don a suit and traipse around in the woods. I hear MANY accounts of the creatures being as thick as hair on a dog's back all over the place. They steal all of the fruit out of orchards, communicate with humans by using telepathy, put pine cones on top of cars to convey a special message... heck, there are some that can't even step off of their back porch without stumbling over the entire lot of the creatures that are there to gift crystals, etc., as well as to collect the gifts that they receive from the human "sages." Couldn't one of these "Squatch Whisperers" at least take a clear photo of one of the many in the troupe? If we can't even get a clear photo or any genetic evidence when these things appear to be all over the place, we'll never obtain a body (harvested or already dead) unless we take a chance on shooting a fool in a suit, or unless someone is lucky enough to find a body. Wait - Is that a black van in the driveway? LOL!

On that note in this thread, the human dna was most consistent. It has always been that way with the physical evidence. I simply don't buy the idea they all were contaminated. Bigfoot might well be too related and yet too wild for official recognition. That fits the definition of a monster which we'd rather not exist.