Leaderboard

Remember that your options are not mutually exclusive. From your list, I'll take 1 and 7 with some confidence and a probability of 2, 4, and 9 contributing as well. Plus, of course, 10. Editorial comment: insistence that all occurrences of an observed result must come from one cause is the territory of fools ... and of scoftics trying to set up a straw-man to knock down. It has nothing to do with the reality of our physical world. MIB

I can see it now. There you are, sitting on the bench in the local jail with all the (excuse the language, but its a quote) mean, nasty, ugly looking people who are mother rapers, father stabbers, father rapers, and they look at you and say, "what are you in for?" And you go, "Litterin..." and they all move away from you on the bench until you add, "And felony texting..." and they will all move back next to you on the bench. Not to make light of reckless driving, but there are already laws on the books. Felony texting charges will likely just be used to extort some extra money or a better guilty plea from poorly represented or unrepresented defendants.

Well, I'm partial to the theory that like all wild animals, the juveniles know to freeze when danger is about. I'm sure others have had this experience, but my dog (a lab with all natural instincts lost to domestication) and I walked w/in 2 feet of a fawn that just stayed hunkered down in the tall grass. The magic database tells us the following: Out of 960 encounters, 43 (credible) encounters involve a juvenile or infant bigfoot. Only once was an obvious infant encountered; when it was it was accompanied by an adult. In nineteen encounters, juveniles are spotted in the company of adults. In these cases, the presumed young range in height from 3 to 5-6 feet. And while I haven't looked them all up for this post, I'm pretty sure that in all of them, the young bigfoot is walking on its own - i.e., not being carried, or clinging to the back, like an infant would be. Twenty-three times, presumed juveniles are encountered on their own, or at least without a visible adult nearby. Where height is reported, they range in height from 3 feet (your typical tow-headed kid?) to 6-7 feet (teenagers?). So - have the babies and the nursery well off the beaten track, stay very quiet and reclusive while you have an infant, then start going into "normal" mode once the infants reach the age/size where they're semi-capable?

I thought this was interesting, and although it doesn't directly add to our knowledge of what BF might do with their dead, it was still impressive and informative. If a badger can bury a cow this well, I imagine one or more BF could bury another BF pretty darn effectively if it/they needed to. Linked article includes timelapse video of a badger burying a cow: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/31/can-you-dig-it-badger-captured-on-camera-burying-cow From the accompanying article: Or, as someone else put it, "the cow was badgered, but the badger was not cowed."

Manslaughter, lol that's pretty funny. No one will ever be convicted of manslaughter for killing a monster ape... It doesn't work that way in the real world... Of course they aren't going to bag one, being a reality tv show.. However they also do this on their own time and dime, so who knows, might actually have a body soon... Oh wait, we the public will never hear about that body though...

I wish them the best. I would much rather watch people trying to end the mystery than perpetuating it.......