Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/02/2017 in all areas

  1. They're not really covering it up; they have no duty or responsibility to confirm the fact they exist. All government agencies - federal or state - have more of a duty and responsibility to avoid unnecessarily alarming the public. Staying on good terms with the mining and timber industries is a just a career side benefit. No government "hornets" involved. The folks that know ain't talking, those that don't know are not going to risk their careers asking. What can they say? Not odd at all. The military has every right and duty to tell those trainees the truth about the presence of Sasquatch in those areas. The majority of the trainees most likely thought the "Sasquatch thing" was BS when they joined the military.
    2 points
  2. Dmaker said: " Branco, as for your memo claim? Your outline of it is rather vague. I asked if you were saying Obama issued a memo dealing with bigfoot and Ketchum. You said yes, it would cover both of those topics. That is different than a secret bigfoot memo. I'm sure you could produce some report about some memo that covered some scope of wildlife in general and one could loosely apply that to both bigfoot and Ketchum's study. That is not what I meant. For about the third time, I ask that you read this carefully. This is what I said: "Kind'a think they may have given Dr. Sykes a little heads up & advice when he visited that lab a time or two before he revealed his findings. If Dr. Sykes had actually found that the DNA of that one sample from the USA was from a relic hominid, his testing would have violated regulations established in response to a Presidential Memo issued by Obama while Dr. K's work was ongoing. Had he declared the sample from the "cross breed bear" showed it was really a Sasquatch, that Memo and the scientific community would have discredited him and his work. by hook or crook. Dmaker said: I'll ask you directly. Did this memo mention bigfoot and Ketchum specifically? If not, then I don't care about it at all. If your answer is yes, then we might have a bet. That was never part of the bet, the bet was about the existence of the memo. Read what I said a few more times, maybe that little 25 watt watt bulb will light up. Thanks for the advice WSA; I will follow it to the letter forthwith. Did he really? I had no idea he would have done something like that!
    1 point
  3. Let's concentrate on proving ONE species real first before we start postulating about three seperate species. Holy Cow.
    1 point
  4. Branco, l mostly use Dmaker's views as an inverse indicator of how well my life's experiences have informed me about the world and this topic. His opinions are useful for that, if little else. You'll note he never has much to offer about his actual experiences in the wild, although I think he visited a Provincial park once, took a walk, didn't see a Sasquatch and shut down his field exploration efforts soon thereafter. I'd pay those thousands to see him spend just a single night on the ground alone anywhere south of Montgomery . This, or anything like it, will never happen though. My personal assessment of him is, "Often mistaken, but never in doubt." This is but the latest example. "Ignore" would be my prescription.
    1 point
  5. I'm not going to play silly games with you. You made a claim. You can support it or not. It's up to you. Blowing smoke is not going to make the memo appear, however. Until you provide something convincing that such a memo ever existed, this one gets put on the big pile of Branco fantasy tales.
    1 point
  6. Well. it certainly wasn't "tongue in cheek" to the trainees who saw Sasquatch going about their business while they were going about theirs. I understand the lab has assisted in the DNA confirmation of new species found in this and other countries. Kind'a think they may have given Dr. Sykes a little heads up & advice when he visited that lab a time or two before he revealed his findings. If Dr. Sykes had actually found that the DNA of that one sample from the USA was from a relic hominid, his testing would have violated regulations established in response to a Presidential Memo issued by Obama while Dr. K's work was ongoing. Had he declared the sample from the "cross breed bear" showed it was really a Sasquatch, that Memo and the scientific community would have discredited him and his work. by hook or crook.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...