Leaderboard

Even if I believed all the reports to be true, that still does not make them any more falsifiable. It's a pretty simple concept. Many things. The sheer number of reports yet no hard evidence. The lack of evidence where there should be no shortage. An animal of that size with that reported range requires a pretty large breeding population. A population that would leave behind plenty of evidence. The type of evidence that can be tested to proof. How did you determine that aliens created bigfoot? What evidence do you have of that?

I'm going to tell you this just once, so read it and let me know if you have any questions. Attack the argument, not the member.

I have lots of knowledge. It is real and proven knowledge. Nothing like yours. Based on fantasy and delusion So you have encountered the mythical beings created in the fantasy in which your mind has shown you. Even acquired a loyal fan along the way. DWA The most delusional of all the proponents Nothing more than a Binndernagel disciple. A biologist that sells books and stars on YouTube with no proof of nothing but conjecture and less than convincing foot prints. You said I have no clue and yet you go on and on about a creature you saw that is undocumented. A large creature who remains undiscovered. Meanwhile much smaller creatures are discovered frequently. Of course you and your fan would know that if you had a real education and an understanding how the real world works. They are just stories if can't be examined and analyzed. No insult intended. I would agree with you if you were right. Of course you are not. It is just your opinion that you are . Just like the same way you are convinced that the mythical creature exists because Bindernagel said so.

(See bolded) Not true. What a proponent "thinks" is in the box and what dmaker "thinks" is not in the box doesn't PROVE there is or isn't a porcupine in the box. Neither can prove that without actually looking in the box to see is a porcupine is there. Until they do the 'theory' isn't falsifiable. Neither a proponent nor dmaker can prove each other wrong. There's only one way to test the 'theory'- LOOK IN THE BOX. if both can look in the box then the theory is TESTABLE. And that testing will settle the matter.

I apologize for my part in making your job difficult I am not use to being called a coward At 7 '1" 350 pounds It has never happened before.

Ya think?

I don't think he meant you. I think that is how he refers to a different poster who likes to regal with tales of stalking and killing, etc. That's how I took it, anyway.

Ah, the leader of the troublemakers. I guess this is where I'm supposed to prove myself, huh?

This misidentifying is nothing more than a red herring. It is intended to assuage those who are non-believers. Maybe a soft-fingered, computer geek from Manhattan could be convinced he didn't really see what he saw. The little geek wouldn't know a flower from a rock. If I had a sighting, there is no one alive who could convince me what I really saw was a bear on two legs. I've spent too much time int he woods.

Yes and no. Since I've seen 2 for sure, probably a 3rd, they unquestionably do exist, so the issues are 1) opportunity for further study, 2) impact on them of discovery, and 3) impact on us of discovery. Regarding wanting them "discovered", the question comes down to whether the pluses for #1 offset the costs for #2 and #3. I don't think so, at least not today. For now, I'll do what study I can, personally, while avoiding the costs. MIB

This goes for all members. We are short in mods right now, I don't have the time to follow your conversations to see who said what and it's not even my job. I also was not trained as a mod, don't know the warning system and don't care to learn it. I only know ON and OFF.

One film and 10000 failures Not good odds I love the Patterson film. The rest not so much. Especially false claims filled with arrogance and nothing to support the claim. Unless you count blurry pics and films. Oh and Lord Bindernagel. I must not leave out the UFO connection. That is very important to the cause.

Why do you need a few months of solid field immersion? You have thousands of reports of people coming across one when they aren't even trying.

It's like going to the circus and stopping to laugh at the dancing bear. You can't help it. The antics are amusing. Hint, you're the bear. (apologies to all bears everywhere)