Leaderboard

Do you really think there are that many of those here? Or any, for that matter? If so, what is your litmus test for those folks, how can you tell? And PG, I think the value in sharing the "same old" stuff is twofold: they are data points that at the bare minimum have a time and location associated with them, which helps others know when and where to look; and if you look carefully at the contextual minutiae, you often find details that are NOT the same old stuff. If you'll indulge me in an analogy, I sometimes feel like there's one group of us studying slides under a microscope, and another group watching with beers and arms crossed saying "Yep another piece of glass with some gunk on it, same old."

All of the warts aside, that's likely what Ketchum was onto when she ran the complete genome.

People sharing wood knocks, stick teepees and random animal noises have bigfoot living within minutes of just about everyone in the USA. Many people don't even have to leave their back porch. Research is supposed to narrow down possibilities and hone in "successful" techniques. Bigfoot "research" expands the bigfootery infinitely. Just what kind of "findings" are being shared?

Yeah, though I must say that I don't have horses, nor have I ever researched with them. Horses do make noise, but it's a natural type of noise. While it could be a horse, it could also be an elk or such. Machines sound very unnatural in the woods and stand out against all the other sounds. Horses sound just like the other animals until it got close enough to hear things like tack squeaking or rattling. 17x7