Leaderboard

I said assumption, not observation. Existence is not in question, that is a matter of observation, not assumption. Beyond that, more or less. However, I still prefer an F&B solution and I'd prefer to leave aliens and interdimensional things out of the mix, at least until they are unavoidably necessary to address field observation. Certain "camps" within the bigfoot world place their own arbitrary requirements, their dogma, about what bigfoot can and can't be, what it must and must not do, etc. with no scientific basis. In fact, there are counter examples such knotheads refuse to see because acknowledging the counter-example challenges the dogma. They claim to be "scientific" but they are the farthest thing from it. Rather, I suggest letting the questions lead and just follow whatever answers come without pre-judging and cherry picking. MIB

That is absolutely wrong. You need to do a little reading about Indian history. The Crow Creek Massacre occurred in the early to mid-1300s. Many think around 1325. Virtually all of the Indian villagers (Arikara) were scalped including women and children. Villagers had been beheaded, had their tongues ripped out, hands and feet cut had been off, and general aboriginal butchering the likes of which was performed on animals. So don't give me this nonsense that Indians learned scalping from Europeans. The Indians were masterfully scalping women and children long before Europeans settled here.

On the contrary Norseman, this link explains that human intrusion into their habitat , and human female vulnerability are more predominant factors. The truth is that great ape males including other hominins WILL TRY IT, and if there is enough compatibility, there will be offspring. https://books.google.com/books?id=afADAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT29&lpg=PT29&dq=chimp+rapes+woman&source=bl&ots=gEQKDDoWoT&sig=idmoCpG60wly2VI__mQXTPIs0RI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjR46OTyovWAhUo6oMKHeDLDWwQ6AEIXzAI#v=onepage&q=chimp rapes woman&f=false

I am not "wrong" but I choose to disagree with your opinion. Opinions vary, prove me wrong. I would like to qualify my earlier post about Disotell being the man to analyze potential DNA for the Olympic Project. I would imagine he was chosen because he is a known quantity hanging at BeachFoot and such and being on some TV BF study teams. Would not have been my choice, but it is not my money and certainly I'm not on the team that discovered the samples and nests. Doesn't change my opinion of the Olympic Project or the members/players of that team of whom I have great esteem, despite having been dropped on some friend lists due to my political opinions on other platforms. Wishing them good results and good hunting nevertheless.

Look at the atrocities committed by the Comanche, not just against whites but other tribes as well. Cruelty is a trait that doesn't follow ethnicity. Were Northern Europeans treated well by invading Romans, Huns and Mongols? No of course not. Both sides of the same coin. Kathy? What I'm saying is that I see no correlation in how Europeans treated American Indians and Bigfoot. Bigfoot is a creature that lives in the forests of North America we cannot even find. And not a entity we could wage war with directly, trade with, negotiate with or sign treaties as we did with Indians. It acts more like an animal than a tribe of Indians no matter what it is.

It's not even a wall....it's a virtual wall. People's brains are being sucked into social media, xboxes, I phones and all the rest. People walk and text oblivious to the world around them. Scary. As far as backpacking dying? They should look at mule/horse packing! Virtually a lost art to modern society.....