Leaderboard

You're talking about Colorado Bigfoot? His general area is Mt of the Holy Cross. Not very easily accessible - some of his favorite spots apparently don't open until mid-June due to snow. If you want something more manageable, I've had good luck in Lost Creek Wilderness.

SB, this then, in turn, begs the question: Why do bigfoot build useless, odd, ramshackle constructions with no seeming utility? It would seem they would spend their time foraging or hunting. Also, Occam comes into play, here. If human activity can explain the "structures" existence, that is the simplest explanation and it's not necessary to conjure up "hairy people" engineers.

IIRC, domain registration documentation showed that the url and domain was created by a dummy factor and then the journal was putatively bought? Fabricated is what it was. This history is so not relevant to me any longer that I am not even interested in documenting these thoughts further. Research and the wayback machine may help you here.

Ketchum fabricated a journal, bought it, threw up some stuff to see if it stuck and you expect us to see through the poison cloud and view the professional work leading to a bleach-scrubbed anticlimactic implosion? Puh leease!

It was the first time I had ever used one and they are pretty cool . I do a lot of searching at night along rivers and remote lakes from a small boat . I can't say I've seen anything that resembled a bigfoot but I've seen plenty of deer and bears walking along the shorelines. I guess I'm just hoping to get that lucky sighting one night and then search the area during the day casting some foot prints and hopefully maybe some hair samples . Walking in the woods during the day with my camcorder is such a shot in the dark (pardon the pun) that I figured going with a thermal was my best bet . If you do decide to go with a camcorder like I did just make sure you also go with a monopod to carry it . It's makes a steadier picture through the view finder . I just wanted to add it's amazing the amount of animals you will see visit rivers and lakes under the cover of darkness during the summer and I imagine during the fall.

Lack of proof is not proof of lack. We don't have proof as science requires else bigfoot would not remain an officially undocumented species. That's a given. Further harping on it is fundamentally dishonest, a well spun strawman. Let it go. An intelligent discussion conducted with integrity leaves "proof" out. What we should be talking about is **evidence**, not proof. Balance of evidence, pro and con, considering both quantity and quality. What I've seen isn't relevant, what matters here is that the evidence, considered on the whole, is of such volume and such consistency that institutional science should be taking greater notice, participating in the discovery process, not waiting for amateurs to hand it to them. MIB