Leaderboard

Can you proffer any scientific studies which prove your assertion or is it just 100%, pure conjecture on your part? This business about dismissing, out of hand, a lie detector test is utter rubbish. If a person fails it, it proves beyond all doubt they're a liar. If they pass it, well, it's no big deal because it's meaningless. What clear-thinking person can draw a conclusion like that?

Getting warmer. I'd summarize, based on his story, that he was indeed poaching when he ran into, and shot, 2 bigfoots. Chickened out. Left. He went back 6-7 weeks later with some known bigfooters, recovered something from under the snow which turned out to be bear, and sent a sample of that to Ketchum who lied about the results of testing. That can be substantiated by careful study of what each person has said ... including some who were arguing back and forth, not cooperating. All anyone has to do is take the time and make the effort to review the past threads here, various youtube vids, and so on. This explanation fits and accounts for everything. All other explanations require careful cherrypicking ... including deliberately ignoring ... information. MIB

He would have never been prosecuted for murder. That internet theory is hilarious. Instead of discussing current Bigfoot research this old crap is still talked about. Theorizing on it will never change the fact that all of it was flawed and nothing ever came of it and nothing ever will from that camp. A waste of time, money, and ruined some peoples careers because of their unscrupulous methods. Made liars out of others. Debating it at this point and time will never change those facts no matter what side of the fence you're on.