Leaderboard

Ok, I'm glad I waited and checked things out more. What I found out by scaling the shoulder width of the creature in the PGF was that it had a total shoulder span of 30 inches. I had to do some rescaling to make sure that figure was correct. The average total shoulder span of a male Human is only around 18.5 inches. So a difference of around 11.5 inches wider for Patty. The supposed wearer of the Patty 'suit' had a shoulder span of 19.8 inches which is still a total shoulder span that is over 10 inches narrower than Patty's. Patty's arms hang down straight and swing naturally from the shoulders. That would not be the case for someone whose shoulders were a full 5 inches shorter on each side. At the very least such a situation would make a Human's elbows in the suit look higher up on the arms or stick out akimbo-like and have to swing around the body instead of the natural forwards and back. For myself? The only answer to this issue that I can come up with is that the PGF shows a real, and alive at the time, female Sasquatch. Happy 50th, Patty.

What took you so long!?

http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/p/ketchum-dna-study-sample-26.html Justin Smeja sent a small piece of this sample to the Ketchum DNA Study that was ongoing at the time of the incident. (Figure 1). Dr. Ketchum wanted to make sure this sample was from a Bigfoot and not a known animal so she had the flesh analyzed by Douglas G. Toler, MD, F.C.A.P. of the Anatomic and Clinical Pathology, Huguley Pathology Consultants, P.A. 11803 S. Freeway Ft. Worth, TX 76115. Dr. Toler determined that the skin was not human and that the tissue was not contaminated with bacteria or fungus. If the skin was from a bear or other known animal Dr. Toler would have made that identification. He did not. (Attachment 1). Dr. Ketchum also removed several hairs with follicles from Sample 26 and sent it to Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences (Dallas, TX) for analysis. The hair was determined not to be human or any other known animal. The hair was consistent with the Bigfoot control sample and determined to be from a Bigfoot. Hair Samples were also sent to Patrick W. Wojtkiewicz of the North Louisiana Criminalistics Laboratory, Shreveport, LA or DNA extraction and sequencing. The follicles were processed for DNA using a robotic extraction process to ensure no human contamination. mtDNA and nuDNA were successfully extracted and sequenced. The DNA from the hair follicles that were extracted robotically and at this independent facility matched the core sample DNA processed by Dr. Ketchum. Dr. Ketchum removed a core sample from the flesh to ensure no contamination. This sample contained a high quality DNA that yielded both mtDNA and nuDNA. The mtDNA was consistent with the finding of the other samples in the study with the same unexplainable anomalies found in the other 111 samples. The nuDNA did not match any DNA in the Genbank Genome Database but was consistent with the other two samples in the study that yielded a complete Genome. (Samples 31 and 140). The results were added to the study before submission to the Journal Nature for Peer Review. This doesn't read that she intentionally mislead anyone. Key word here is INTENTIONALLY. Of course no one can, or is willing to, make that distinction still. Nope. Slam her all the way just like always.

These look a lot like the images and measurements that the late John Green put into one of his books.

H, The naysayers have the pulpit but their homilies are bereft of factual evidence. This type of behavior is why (IMO) Sasquatchery is still stuck in 1968.