Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/03/2017 in all areas

  1. The images I saw of humans walking in a store using FLIR 640 were very compelling. You could see layers of hair. If someone is fortunate enough to get a sasquatch up close using Pulsar or FLIR 640, it might provide some details that will be very interesting ti see.
    1 point
  2. With bacon, the first thing I'd catch is myself.
    1 point
  3. Had more than one acquaintance send me the link with the same kind of '"YOU SEE!!!" message attached. "Meh" is my response. It seems thought-stopping articles like this one are just too enticing to pass up for anyone who has limited knowledge. Well, maybe that is the point. Doesn't take much for an incurious population to be persuaded there is nothing to see, does it? When I asked my crow-serving acquaintances if the study was looking at mDNA or nDNA, I got not a glimmer of recognition from them. Right, just give me the Cliff Notes, I don't wanna read some big boring book. Is it any wonder?
    1 point
  4. That's not disinformation. It's not desperation, it is frustration that comes from having to coddle FOOLS. There are two kinds of authority. You're (deliberately?) mixing them up. There is authority from power and authority from qualified expertise. Truly, bucking authority-of-power takes courage and is commendable when that authority is wrong. However, you're attacking authority-of-qualification as if your personal subject matter ignorance excuses you from the need to get it right. You are, when it comes to fact, WRONG. What you're doing is either fundamentally dishonest and manipulative or it is rooted in the grossest of ignorance. There is truth .. somewhere. It's not in the bottom of a cool aid jug, neither proponent nor denialist. You do more harm to others' search for truth when you treat everything like it is bigfoot than the scoffing denialists do when they try to get honest seekers to not look at evidence at all. Their deception is confrontational while yours is insidious. The path to finding that truth, whatever it is, is to ignore the extremists from both ends of the spectrum as the frauds they are and follow the data rather than the delusion. The bottom line is the test results came back bear because what was tested was bear. Guess what? Bears are real. Yep, I've seen 'em. That has no bearing on the existence of bigfoot at all. It only needs to for the grossly insecure. MIB
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...