Leaderboard

True. But in either case, denial or failure to acknowledge, would her enterprise be viewed as fraudulent? That question would shift the point of argument back to whether or not Sasquatch exists would it not? Because one cannot run a fraudulent Sasquatch tour business if Sasquatch is real. So if it is ruled that she is allowed to run her business then the burden is on the state to show HOW that business is NOT fraudulent. So would such a ruling indicate that the Responders have either testified under oath that the creature is real or admitted as such in the privacy of the judge's chambers? On the flip side, could denying her request to run her enterprise be the result of the State of California, through testimony of the Responders, taking an official stance that the Sasquatch is indeed a myth. And it would have to follow, just how would the Responders KNOW that the creature doesn't exist? If their answer to that satisfies the court both professionally and scientifically then what I said before stands: Anyone and everyone engaged in profiting from anything involving promoting Sasquatch as being real- or even highly suspected as being real- would see those profits suddenly in jeopardy. For if not, then again, the State of California, by taking revenue from any activity including the sale of any books or trinkets, could find itself in trouble for complacency in a scam. Lawyering is all about the finer points of interpretation and I think this post satisfies those finer points. Submitting court papers claiming the safety of the public due to creatures called Sasquatches running around unchecked in the woods is one thing. Add to, and interweave it with an ability or inability to run a business then the business becomes a pry bar to the rest. Very clever. As said- it's a potential quagmire with pitfalls everywhere for an unwary court with a witness on one side and a Responder on the other.

Sorry, but the immense overstating of the previous posting is rather sad. What's next? The Cottingly Faries?

Chewy is not real, he is a star wars character. Sasquatch are flesh and blood creatures that can and do make mistakes. They bleed when shot, have scar tissue visible where wounds have healed and are born with genetic defects just like every normal living thing. I am sorry but international space travelers don't get spotted picking through garbage at night every Feb to March outside the town of Orting,WA. They exist under our basic principles of physics and demonstrate normal wildlife behaviors. Please take the paranormal/ alien bigfoot stories to the appropriate section of the forums.

I watched a Nat Geo special on DIan Fossey last night. I had not seen much about her for years since her death. While the intent of the program was to discuss circumstances leading up to her death. There was a lot of footage of her interaction with the mountain gorillas. It occurred to me, watching her go from barely being able to get close, to sitting there playing with the young ones, that her approach has a lot of merit. . Fast forward to my own experiences and what little I have learned. Some of what I have done is I have not reported. Some of you may have guessed but I guess I will still hold back. Still considering a book but I simply need more material. What she learned is that she always had to be submissive. She had to approach them literally crawling because if she stood up, they perceived it as a challenge and got a bluff charge response. If she was submissive, tentative, and even clowned around as if she was the biggest klutz in the world, they would watch her out of interest and let her get closer and closer. She acted her way into their midst. I know BF is a different critter. But experience after experience has shown me that they have similar behaviors. Urinate in their presence and they will react. Twice I have been bluff charged for doing just that. I suspect they thought I was marking territory. Dian became the world expert on the species. Before her little was known about them. She plunked herself right in the middle of there territory and stayed there for years in her camp in their territory. . Somehow I think we have to do something similar with BF. The Tarzan springs incident points to that as a valid tactic. It probably takes a female or a small group with a female included to pull it off. She brought men in but she had paved the way. I was surprised to see one of the scientists, who appears with Meldrum, on some of the BF documentaries, was there for a time in her camp. When we look at some of the more famous BF hunters, especially of the past, they came dressed and equipped like they were on an elephant hunt. Many armed appropriately. Some of these have never had contact. Dian had guns but it was to protect her from the poachers who ultimately killed her by hacking her to death with machetes. . Even that should be considered a warning for BF field researchers. If you find a tribe of BF in private timber company forest, you might be as unpopular as Dian was with the poachers. With millions of dollars of timber at stake, it could be very dangerous to expose BF to the world. Just some thoughts I wanted to share before I forgot about it.

Night Walker: Casting is more art than science. The real problem is getting the casting material in the footprint without disturbing or destroying fine details. If the casting material is too viscous, then it can damage the impression. One has to look a law enforcement who has the most experience and practice to cast. Plaster of paris was used for years and does a good job with fine details but it is weak and somethings comes apart when it is taken out of hard ground. I like Hydrocal which is a similar material of different composition that results in a stronger cast. Probably the best caster I have been around is Cliff Barrackman. I attended a seminar at a Bigfoot Conference where he showed his casting techniques. Meldrum attended the seminar and his input was that you need to completely photograph the footprint before you try to cast. Sometime casting will destroy it. Have a ruler visible in the picture. The boot thing is not professional. I use a cloth taylors tape. Circle it, taking pictures from all the way around. That helps him know what the environment around the cast was and lets him evaluate what the BF might have been doing when it left the print. I will highlight some of the stuff Cliff showed but probably have forgotten some stuff. If the footprint is in dry dust casting material will really mess it up. Several light coats of hairspray will stabilize the dust. Just mist it on, It dries very fast and sort of glues the surface dust together. If you have the spray use it on any print. It will help and cannot hurt. Then he would shake dry casting material into the footprint. A shaker with holes in the top that had grated cheese with a bunch of holes in the lid is really good for that. Then you mix the casting material. You want it the consistency of light pancake batter. Not real thick but not super runny. Then he took his rubber gloved hand and sort of dribbled the casting material from his hand into the inner surface of the print. If you just pour it, it will distort or destroy a lot of fine details. Once the inner surface is covered with the casting material, gently pour it into the footprint filling it to overflowing. The next part is what most people screw up. The casting material, especially plaster of paris will harden in just a few minutes. But it will not be hard enough to remove for several hours. The longer you wait the greater the chance that you get it out intact. Once out take it home and let it harden overnight or up to 24 hours before you attempt to clean it up and remove loose stuff like pebbles and pine needles. Those can be gently brushed or washed off. You really have to be careful with this process. Here is a link that details a lot of this. http://www.tracksceneinvestigation.com/TSI PDFs/CASTING.pdf Now to your question about liquid latex. What I have seen it is more viscous than Hydrocal. That makes getting it into the footprint more difficult. I think the setup / cure time is considerably longer than Hydrocal or plaster of paris. One of the problems of casting material is just carrying the weight around. Since most of us carry water it makes sense to me to carry water that can be drunk all the time and if you find a print use it to mix your casting material. The latex is heavy and you cannot drink it. I carry the Hydrocal in a gallon zip lock in an amount appropriate for most castings and just add water to the bag to mix the product. Have rubber gloves with you because plaster of paris and Hydrocal are strong base materials and you don't want that on bare hands. Anyway I wish Cliff would put out a casting video since like I said he is pretty good. A good use of latex materials is making copies of your plaster cast. Make a mold of the cast with latex then you can make all the copies of you cast that you want to. Meldrum sells them at conferences.