Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/04/2018 in all areas

  1. I was addressing Inc’s Post that I quoted. He was addressing only the legality concerning hunters. But my advice to the OP stands. If he is concerned about safety while hiking during rifle hunting season? Wear orange. I do not wear orange while I’m out hunting Bigfoot. Apes have trichromatic vision......as we are also Apes. So it’s a deterrent against other hunters mistaking you for an animal and shooting you. But if your goal is to shoot another species of Ape? Not so much.... Although reading the Missing 411 books, it’s noted that hunting alone while wearing hunter orange makes it a higher probability that you will disappear. It has not happened yet.....
    1 point
  2. Hunter orange is NOT mandatory in British Columbia or Alberta at all, although some will wear it going to and from their hunting area. Of course it is also common in BC to go out and not see another hunter for days, depending on where you hunt.
    1 point
  3. On that note, why would any proponent who believes Sasquatch is a real creature even think that a government agency wouldn't already have a type specimen? That a government agency wouldn't already have documentation? That a government agency is already studying and keeping track of these creatures? I mean, if it's all that important, does anyone think that Sasquatch is just being ignored? How can a large hairy biped with a shoulder span of 3-4 feet just be ignored. I still get blown away with such realizations every time I watch the stabilized PGF. I have NOT gotten desensitized as a result of frequent viewing. Patty STILL creates a deep impact behind everything I say and write about, every thread I start, and every aspect of field research and researchers that I read about. It's not an obsession- it's a reality arrived at through logic. And the whole government surveillance dialogue as far as what they know? Logic. A government agency may also know if the creature existed once but no longer. I think it would even be a relief for it if no more creatures existed. But everything points to Sasquatch as still being around. It makes for a tremendous dynamic that should not be, and should never be, underestimated. It's the only thing that keeps the fire hot for discovery and for finding ways to create that discovery. Underestimate nothing.
    1 point
  4. According to this guide, there are still states where it’s encouraged but not mandatory during modern firearm season for deer and or elk. Here in Washington it’s required for the deer and elk modern firearm season and nothing else. Turkey and waterfowl, Bear, Varmint, etc, plus archery and muzzleloader for deer and elk. http://www.hunter-ed.com/blog/blaze-orange-regulations-every-state/
    1 point
  5. But it's this stuff that's the interesting part, and this runs pretty consistent through the entire Klamath Watershed, consistent enough anyway for me to spend a lot of time on it. This screen shot is from the Lower Klamath Zone, our data.
    1 point
  6. Absolutely, but the creek there is key imo. Not the only key of course, but it appears to most certainly be one key.. ---- This is exactly where my head is right now Randy, hence my efforts in to this and the specifics Randy..;) ---- Here Explorer, just a regular report with info on the area, maps and of course the data. Purely objective, nobody interested in my opinion so it's solely objective..;)
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...