Leaderboard

1) REPORTS Our man DWA would be clicking his heels right now! 2) FOOT CASTS Especially the Bossburg tracks from my home of Stevens County! Whoop! 3) PGF Only 3rd!?? Whaaaaaaa? Yup......read it and weep Sweaty Yeti and Kitakaze. 4) INDIAN FOLKLORE I’d place this up near the top. It’s my opinion that the Hobbit proved local folklore. Minus the woo of course. 5) AUDIO RECORDINGS I put very little faith in this stuff, I’ve listened to a lot of Coyote calls and other mundane animals claimed to be Bigfoot. The Sierra sounds are not Coyotes. I will withhold judgement there. Kinda sounds like uncle Bob with a gravelly voice in the bushes with his foot caught in a bear trap. 6) DERMAL RIDGES Yes they can be faked! Just like tracks! But what about the ones that supposedly show a cut that has healed? And on a track over the span of many years and hundreds of miles apart? Chilcutt claimed it was the same creature..... http://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/finding-bigfoot/lists/6-healed-dermal-scars-on-track-casts/ What is your opinion on the ranking of the list? I see they left out DNA and Hair and blood samples, test results. And of course snow tracks of large bipedal trackways walking cleanly through deep snow is near and dear to my heart. They also left out the 411 books..... thoughts?

What's in bold is what should be on every ones mind when it come to making a call on these creatures. I find that the best evidence that Finding Bigfoot have ever provided is the witnesses that they have provided on the show. Since it shows their true sincerity of what they have witnessed. You can see that they have truly seen some thing that is not normal or that is not some thing that we see in our wilderness all the time. What I some times do not see is their nervousness when they go back to where they seen these creatures. But this could be that they might be among others who believe in what they have seen. Even then I am also skeptical of some of these witnesses that they choose . But they might have a reason for this and that is to show a difference between the two types of witnesses who have seen these creatures and those who have not. Since it is a show it could be that some of these witnesses might just be in it to be on TV or a way for a town to bring in income. But evidence will always point to there being the existence in an area of these creatures. And the show always have a way of pointing that out in the end. They do not always have to show these creatures and it really does not matter to me since it is only a show. But the satisfying of our own curiosity of their existence should be the interest of every one's mind. Nothing should stop us from finding the truth.

Just so you'll know WSA, I said that to get ahead of the chucklehead scofftics who will come here and say "hur dur, looks at the silly 'footer's". Wasn't aiming it at you or anyone in particular. I try to look at what is offered with an objective eye and I believe that is what most who make the offer want, not cheerleading or accepting it as abject proof. I'm only interested in satisfying my own curiosity and that's where I differ from other skeptics/scofftics. One I see the information I feel I need to make a call, I bow out and don't feel the need or see a reason to berate those who offer the evidence or to cheer them on.

Giant bipedal primates.....BEHOLD!