Leaderboard

The video does suggest the track makers' awareness of it's own tracks where it seems to side step along the top of logs when possible, as if it knows it needs to do that in case it is being tracked and it could help lose a tracker on it's trail. I can't think of another reason for it unless it was just tired of lifting its feet high out the snow for each step.

I don't agree with the black and white assumption that there is either proof or there is nothing. Einstein presented scientific papers in 1905, the miracle year, where he proved his theory of special relativity. It threw the scientific world on its ear. His theory only worked when objects moved at a constant speed. Einstein knew his theory applied to everything in the universe but his calculations fell short when you allowed for acceleration. Einstein proposed his theory of general relativity in 1915 and it took an eclipse in 1919 to prove it. So, from 1905 to 1919 there was no "proof" of general relativity so everything from 1905 to 1919 was "conjecture". In between those years was his theory which needed to be proved and this theory, I would submit, was far more than mere conjecture. I will also submit that until such time as a sasquatch is proven to exist, there is a lot more than mere conjecture. Much more.

I have 2 hammocks right now and may get a third. One is a Warbonnet Ridgerunner "bridge" hammock. I have low back and neck issues. The bridge hammocks, compared to traditional gathered-end hammocks, allow for a flatter "lay" instead of being positioned like a banana. Another is an UL ENO gathered end hammock. The one I'm considering is a Amok Draumr hammock .. this is sort of like a bridge hammock but oriented with the head and feet 90 degrees from the line of the main ropes for dead flat lay. I'm not interested in hammocks for run of the mill car camping or backpacking, I'm looking at them in the context of "hanging" over rocky stream beds trout fishing where there simply is no flat ground to set up a tent on but there are trees. I do not know if I can do the hammocks at all but I'm going to try. As wiiawiwb suggests, it is possible to get very light tents that are noticeably lighter than a hammock with the same features ... fly vs tarp, etc. Only adding utility, the ability to camp in places I simply can't with a tent, would push me that way. Succeed or fail, I think the ENO hammock is a keeper if only as a place to keep gear up off the ground and away from pesky rodents. I will try to report back over the summer regarding actual field results, not just what worked or didn't, but why or why not because those factors might not apply to everyone equally and could predict different outcomes. MIB

I'm seeing Jane Goodall speak tonight. If there is a Q&A afterwards, I wonder how she would answer a bigfoot question.

I see the trackers reacting as most probably would in that situation, and it comports with the described location and degree of remoteness. It agrees with how I've reacted when I've come across something remarkable deep in the backcountry. Think about it. You probably have limited time to go where you want to go and get back. You didn't come prepared to deal with evidence of the kind you've found. You don't have the ability or even the desire to come back there again...even if you are convinced the evidence is likely to be there if/when you return. (Snow tracks? fuggedaboudit) So what do you do? You use what you have, in this case you video it and hope it shows it well enough to convey how unique it is. Do our videographers do that here? I think so. I mean, we can all armchair these guys to say how they should have done this or that differently, but as someone who has been in some "HOLY COW" backcountry situations, you really can't put yourself in a calm, relaxed remove from the experience to think of it in those terms. Case in point, contained in something I read about recently, by author Craig Childs...brilliant writer on all things natural history on the Colorado Plateau. He and a bud once found a perfectly in situ relic...a large grain storage jar that they just happened to see under the rock they were sitting on. They had been wandering for a couple of days, in slot canyons and arroyos and had only the most basic idea of where they were. In a remarkable display of self control, they didn't remove it, look into it or even touch it. A dozen years later they decided they needed to go back and just confirm for themselves it was still there. I won't spoil the story for any who want to go and look up his account, but just suffice to say I recognize the outcome...been there, done that!

I looked at hammocks several years ago and almost pulled the trigger on a Warbonnet. In the end, I decided against it because it is would be used when backpacking and the weight was too much for me to justify. I could get a Zpacks cuben-fiber tent for much less weight and have more room inside. Moreover, if I'm caught out on a rainy day and had to hunker down, the tent provided a much better space than being confined to a hammock. I might still get a hammock and use it on overnights when I know the weather is going to be good.

Well, you could be tracking the tracker that is tracking the bigfoot tracks. LOL ,I mean you would want to find out the story, even if it was to bust the hoaxer.

Here's what I sometimes think about...on the subject of tracking, reading sign and woodcraft in general: I don't believe that at one not-so-distant time we were a civilization of Daniel Boones, reading the ground like a book, picking up data at a glance to know the shape, size, gait, and mood of every animal that made tracks. Like most things I'm sure, some were better than others at it, and some were not good at it at all. Some even did achieve mythical status for their abilities. Like most learned skills , they were passed one generation to the other, and honed through repeated use. Rural populations were proportionally larger on comparison to urban ones, and more people earned their livings out of doors. I think this probably resulted in a much higher level of attention the average person (hunter or not) paid to their usual surroundings in general. Very few would dispute this, but maybe some have not thought too much about the degree the diminishment of these skills have kept us mired in uncertainty at the very point in human history when our ability to share information is at its zenith. My perfect scenario for Sasquatch field studies is a population with THAT level of outdoor situational awareness AND with crazy technological skills. We may have had tons of practical Sasquatch knowledge in centuries past, but we had no way to really share it with too many others. We see hints of it here and there...old newspaper blurbs, tribal stories, etc. Now we have speed of light, universal data sharing capabilities, but the comparative ability of many to to perceive what is actually going on around them is so degraded I'm not sure we've gained any ground. We may very well have lost some. I will concede the skeptics' point that this marriage of diminished capacity & technology can result in lots of confused people and garbled conclusions. Then of course there is evidence like the snow tracks documented in the video above. Some things are just "hit you on the head" obvious, and it took no Daniel Boone to get that. The shame is, think what a killer video an expert tracker or woodsman of that caliber could have narrated?! What was missed, if only the person had had the skill to see it?