Leaderboard

Squatchy, with all due respect, you're just lashing out at everything. There are members here that are trying to run things to ground with good thinking dialogue. Whether for good or for naught remains to be seen. That's seems to be what this 'room' is doing and many enjoy the thought process. I cannot see that you are having any effect whatsoever on anyone with the methods you employ. if members here are to be believed then there are a few mysterious things going on and they are working through them. Trying to cut them off at the knees every chance you get is fairly unproductive IMHO as well as ineffective. Your choice: keep hammering away at everyone or join the conversation and add a few ideas to lend a hand. You could do that once in a while you know

I think the consensus is here it needs to be tested? Right now? Its just a very curious large partial molar. Your just shadow boxing with yourself Squatchy...... calm down.

In case anyone wishes to know I have sent an email off to Dr. Thomas Demere regarding the San Diego dig. The reason is there was mention in the article that there were no hominid fossils yet found at the site. But since it is West Coast U.S. and the tooth in the thread I linked was also West Coast U.S. I thought he would be interested to know if he wasn't already aware of the tooth find. Two other museum curators that I had corresponded with in the Santa Cruz area told me that they did not know of the tooth find (it is in the thread) and I have never heard back from either one in all this time. And I just may not hear back from Dr. Demere either.

The word intended was " truth ". > Words don't have value if they can't stand the test of truth. The auto-correct feature ( device word history + my wife is a teacher = truancy ) plagues me every so often. Everyone should provide evidence that their case is legitimate. I have collected historic information, witness testimony, recorded unknown vocals and cast tracks in the area of my 09 sighting. None of that is enough, so I moved myself to a place where I can up the odds of getting more information to support my position. I am out looking more often than most to get the answers to the questions while respond here making assumptions about films, reports and even character. I have posted in response to others making assumptions/claims but I have found that you can't find a point of reason with some of the people involved. The people I gave mention in my above post are not the proponents or believers, I am talking about those who just want to educate themselves on the truth. If you post something and expect others to absorb the information then it is your responsibility to separate opinions from fact. That is what the entire point of discussion here, ask anyone reading.

Should the consideration of adding 'it is my opinion' not apply to everyone else posting in this thread? It's an internet message board. Unless a post is cited with a scientifically supported (real, published reviewed science -- not bigfoot science) anything that is posted here is 'of my opinion' 'of your opinion' 'of his opinion' 'of her opinion'... I don't think you know what truancy means. As for my motivations -- I've made it pretty clear where I stand. In this thread and others. You mean like your alleged sighting? The [proponents] people weighing the topic can't even agree among themselves if bf is a flesh and blood creature or a paranormal entity. So please tell me more about demonstrating a perceived truth with nothing to back up the claim. That door swings both ways. Which people? What has been said that stands on its own? The only thing that stands on its own wrt bigfoot is the many hoaxes that have been PROVEN. I suggest you read my signature which I borrowed from truant member Darrel, and was written 6 years ago but still holds up: "This time next year you are all still going to be making the same excuses as to why you can't find bigfoot. 5 years from now same story." Darrell Aug 22 2012

You should really consider adding " It is my opinion " to everything you post as you continue to put out your assumptions as if they are facts. Words don't have value if they can't stand the test of truancy. I don't know your motivations in this topic and I won't guess what they are but I will drop a note. It is foolish for a person to respond with the idea of demonstrating a perceived truth if they have nothing to back up the claim, the people who are weighing the topic will not give it consideration. People pay attention to what is being said when it stands on it's own.

All of which are no substitute for a firearm......

The Travel Channel show "Destination Truth" with Josh Gates covers a number of cryptids world wide. They seem to take a pretty aggressive approach and get some interesting results. In their Yeti episode, they cast a track that Jeff Meldrum thinks is likely authentic. He brings a quirky sense of humor to the show that I enjoy and does some flat out crazy things to search out answers.