Leaderboard

What if your state of delusion is real? what do you do then when confronting these so called scientist. They can call me what ever they want and it is not going to change a thing since they should be open to things not yet discovered. The only entity that could be holding them back is some thing that is higher then them. Some thing that does not want them to discover what is out there that can change the way we think. An entity that is so high up that can change the way one lives in this world. No one in their right mind wants to loose their esteem that they had work so hard for. So they will not risk their career on some thing that can change the way we believe. There are some powerfull entities in this world that does not want this truth to come out in the open that can change the way we believe. I wish you luck as well but I have learned that it is better to stay silent. Let this world be and live the way that it is intended and not change it .It might be better for our good.

I'm not sure what should be discussed here if you won't share your methodology--namely the questions you are asking. Otherwise, this seems to add up to "I'm asking some sciency people some stuff about bigfoot hoping they will say bigfoot is real" Good luck with that. So, any scientist who disagrees with you is wrong?

dmaker, you are not paying attention. You have remembered nothing that would support my endeavors. You post is glaringly evident of that. There certainly IS good reason for examination. A side benefit to this is finding scientists who SAY there is no good reason for close examination because it tells me that they put the cart before the horse- same as you if I may respectfully say so. And to be clear, I am not titillated by endless strings of unverifiable anecdotes either. Which is why I think I am well suited for this task. To address this: And you think I do not understand that why exactly? After all, I fully understand that you have allowed yourself two safety valves by using the words "most" instead of its definitive cousin "all" and skipping the "likely " thing altogether. It tells me you are not entirely sure and kind of leaves you a seat on the bandwagon should a bandwagon come along. A small amount of veiled prodding perhaps? Or a bit of fishing? I will not inform you of what is in my correspondence dialogues. You seem to be busy enough without me adding potential ideas to your current skeptic's repertoire.

I would like to go to that one but the timing is awful. That is the most active time in the woods for bigfoot activity in my area. Somewhere in the ballpark of 75-90% of the full year's reports come frome the last week of August through Labor Day weekend. Here it is time to be out DOING the research, not sitting in a convention hall TALKING about the research. MIB

It is a fantastic woods gun. I have a Glock 40 MOS which is a long-slide 10mm. I put a Burris Fast Finder III on it and shoot more accurately than any other firearm I own. There is almost no recoil because it is absorbed by the long slide (6" barrel). My Dan Wesson ECO 9mm jumps around in my hand while the 10mm stays put. I also put a green laser on it. My favorite firearm to shoot is my Ruger Toklat (named after the river in Alaska). No close seconds. It is a Super Redhawk, 6-cylinder 454 Casull with a 5" barrel. The Alaskan in 454 Casull is backstrap heavy (handle) and the 7" barrel is nose heavy. The 5" Toklat has a very nice balance between the two. As you mentioned it also shoots 45 Colt. It is just plain fun to shoot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll--DXOWPyA

Thanks everyone. There is probably never going to be a good time to do this sort of thing so why wait? Might find out something important that I.....er.....didn't know was important. NatFoot, I cannot at this time as they concern subjects not on the General Forum. Other subjects are still active as far as email correspondences go. Try to also understand that this subject as a rule puts off science, so being at all successful means that scientists will not be blabbed all over a paranormal Forum. I only began in the last few days and the few from a year ago I do not have permission to print. So far I do not have enough depth to firmly state a sort of official point of view but bits and pieces of info are trickling in slowly I can now at least say that the fossil tooth does not appear to be linked to a 130,000 year old hominid so any connection to the San Diego Mastodon finds does not look good. I am still waiting for the first correspondence that I sent out which was to the actual director of the San Diego site's dig. At the same time, from the photos I had posted here, there was another correspondence that did come back from someone but nothing was mentioned about it being an overly large size. They did say it is a molar, Human, and several thousand years old with a large cavity maybe stemming from the sugars of corn, maybe Maize? I did a follow up on that one just yesterday and waiting to hear back. This does take time because most of it requires waiting. But it is rewarding to communicate with people on stuff and have replies come back.

As long as we got our snake nerd on. Copperhead/viper venom is a mixture of 20 or so enzymes that work together to put the animal down and start the digestive process from the inside out (snakes don't chew their prey) that's the reason for the swelling and tissue necrosis. Coral snake venom (and cobras, mambas, most Australian venomous snakes) is neurotoxic and blocks the communication junction between the muscle and the nerve (acetylcholine receptor site, works just like curare). The nerve still works and the muscle still works but can't communicate so you get paralyses, which is a big problem when the diaphragm is targeted. Some viper venoms are more neurotoxic when the snake is younger because they focus on lizards or frogs which have less efficient circulatory systems so neurotoxic venom works better. When they get older the venom changes (venom ontogeny) to more enzymatic as they switch to small mammals (warm blooded) prey which have a more volume to surface ration (more block shaped) so the digestive part of it is a real advantage. If you drink venom and you don't have any mouth sores or cuts then no problems. Stomach acids break it down quickly. Uhhhh......I did my MS thesis on this stuff back in the day.

I don't have much use for camo. The areas I spend the most time have so much variety so close together it is hard to find a single pattern that fits all of them. My general "uniform" is just drab colored tee shirts, flannel, jeans, and one of several dull green jackets I own. The only camo things I wear much are my hat and day pack, not because I wanted camo, but because what I wanted only came in camo. I have no delusions of sneaking up on them or hiding myself from them. Camo ... if you're thinking about hiding from bigfoot ... is worse than silly, it's naive. You have to manage smell, motion, and also manage how the other animals around you react to you because disturbing them is a dead giveaway. MIB

I deeply value the opinion of bigfoot advocates especially those who spend time in the field. I also deeply value those who have something productive to add. You're on ignore.