Leaderboard

Exactly.... You asked for a clear picture of Bigfoot. I posted it. Now its a clear picture of a person in make up and fur. You have proved my point. It will always be a person in a fur suit for you. But for what its worth? I completely concur with your assessment. Not because I can tell its a man in a fur suit. But because Todd Standing introduced that video of a head with a eye blink. After he first introduced the muppet heads. Of course we both could be wrong and its possible that after hoaxing muppet heads? Standing posted a picture of a real Bigfoot head..... not likely. Anyhow either way I do not believe a photo or a video will ever convince anyone especially science......nor should it. FWIW, I do not believe Todd Standing has any legit photos.....but I cannot prove that. But here again, how do you know the subject has 33 inch shoulders? Unless your there with a measuring tape? It will be subjective.

I've said it would be hard not to be convinced by HD NatGeo quality video of a bigfoot. I've also said that I would be very interested in clear photos of bigfoot. Got any?

And I concur that is public consensus. It has two arms, two legs and a head and shoulders. Add to that the consensus that there is nothing left to discover on Earth other than the odd insect? I find it predictable.

So far, I think this thread is bearing out its original purpose. It was/is, to merely document this stuff that keeps popping up in forested areas in N. America, noting that no plausible evidence of human agency in the creation of it has been advanced, the purpose behind its creation is uncertain, and the creation of it by natural causes is just as unlikely. That there continues to be a correlation between reports of BF encounters in the proximity of these structures makes this phenomenon all the more intriguing. So, to sum it up: 1. These are there. 2. They are either beyond the physical capability of humans without mechanical assistance, or would have no discernible purpose if done in that manner. 3. Wind, rain, ice and snow are inadequate explanations. 4. They are found in the proximity of areas where BF sightings have been reported. 5. There are consistent patterns of construction across time and vast geographic areas. 6. Their purpose is unknown. 7. Their origins remain unexplained. I would welcome any discussion of these points that is evidence based, and not just rank opinion, or any other points germane to the subject, and which I've failed to note.